BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26496566)

  • 1. "Off Label" Use of FDA-Approved Devices and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1149-51. PubMed ID: 26496566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis.
    ; ;
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2014 Jan; 28(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 24730082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 24450669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
    Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Baldwin P
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 81(1):57M-74M. PubMed ID: 19738189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
    Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Johnson MM
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Hooley RJ; Durand MA; Philpotts LE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 27786548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Tomosynthesis: Practical Considerations.
    Friedewald SM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 28411675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
    JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FDA clears Siemens' Opdima digital mammography biopsy & spot imaging system for U.S. marketing.
    Compr Ther; 1997 Sep; 23(9):621. PubMed ID: 9285164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.