These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26496645)

  • 1. Learning What to Want: Context-Sensitive Preference Learning.
    Srivastava N; Schrater P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141129. PubMed ID: 26496645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust decision making in a nonlinear world.
    Dougherty MR; Thomas RP
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):321-44. PubMed ID: 22329684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rational Patient Apathy.
    Noah BA; Reich-Graefe R
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2019; 49(3):535-628. PubMed ID: 30888137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Melioration as rational choice: sequential decision making in uncertain environments.
    Sims CR; Neth H; Jacobs RA; Gray WD
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):139-54. PubMed ID: 23230889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Health Econ; 2006 Aug; 15(8):797-811. PubMed ID: 16615039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inherently irrational? A computational model of escalation of commitment as Bayesian Updating.
    Gilroy SP; Hantula DA
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():43-51. PubMed ID: 26945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational Precision of Mental Inference as Critical Source of Human Choice Suboptimality.
    Drugowitsch J; Wyart V; Devauchelle AD; Koechlin E
    Neuron; 2016 Dec; 92(6):1398-1411. PubMed ID: 27916454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. People learn other people's preferences through inverse decision-making.
    Jern A; Lucas CG; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():46-64. PubMed ID: 28662485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rationalizable irrationalities of choice.
    Dayan P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):204-28. PubMed ID: 24648392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive science as an interface between rational and mechanistic explanation.
    Chater N
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 24648049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion.
    Fiedler K; Freytag P; Meiser T
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):187-206. PubMed ID: 19159153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experiential limitation in judgment and decision.
    Hahn U
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 24648405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():12-38. PubMed ID: 26010559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning the Structure of Social Influence.
    Gershman SJ; Pouncy HT; Gweon H
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 3():545-575. PubMed ID: 28294384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling other minds: Bayesian inference explains human choices in group decision-making.
    Khalvati K; Park SA; Mirbagheri S; Philippe R; Sestito M; Dreher JC; Rao RPN
    Sci Adv; 2019 Nov; 5(11):eaax8783. PubMed ID: 31807706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models.
    Lee MD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 18605474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence.
    Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ
    Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():170-180. PubMed ID: 27093221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational mate choice: theory and empirical evidence.
    Castellano S; Cadeddu G; Cermelli P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 22410366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.
    Foley BR; Marjoram P
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):867-880. PubMed ID: 28669114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.
    Kemp C; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):20-58. PubMed ID: 19159147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.