182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26497027)
1. Multiple imputation strategies for zero-inflated cost data in economic evaluations: which method works best?
MacNeil Vroomen J; Eekhout I; Dijkgraaf MG; van Hout H; de Rooij SE; Heymans MW; Bosmans JE
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Nov; 17(8):939-950. PubMed ID: 26497027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials.
Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W; Kennedy K; Xie F
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jul; 21(5):717-728. PubMed ID: 32108274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.
Gomes M; Díaz-Ordaz K; Grieve R; Kenward MG
Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials.
Bailey BE; Andridge R; Shoben AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 32228491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing data and imputation: a practical illustration in a prognostic study on low back pain.
Vergouw D; Heymans MW; van der Windt DA; Foster NE; Dunn KM; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):464-71. PubMed ID: 22964020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study.
Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():112. PubMed ID: 21194416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.
Marshall A; Altman DG; Royston P; Holder RL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20085642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to deal with missing longitudinal data in cost of illness analysis in Alzheimer's disease-suggestions from the GERAS observational study.
Belger M; Haro JM; Reed C; Happich M; Kahle-Wrobleski K; Argimon JM; Bruno G; Dodel R; Jones RW; Vellas B; Wimo A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():83. PubMed ID: 27430559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The handling of missing data in trial-based economic evaluations: should data be multiply imputed prior to longitudinal linear mixed-model analyses?
Ben ÂJ; van Dongen JM; Alili ME; Heymans MW; Twisk JWR; MacNeil-Vroomen JL; de Wit M; van Dijk SEM; Oosterhuis T; Bosmans JE
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):951-965. PubMed ID: 36161553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handling missing data in patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis alongside randomised clinical trials.
Manca A; Palmer S
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 16162026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple imputation in the presence of non-normal data.
Lee KJ; Carlin JB
Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):606-617. PubMed ID: 27862164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of using different imputation methods for missing quality of life scores on the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of lung-volume-reduction surgery.
Blough DK; Ramsey S; Sullivan SD; Yusen R;
Health Econ; 2009 Jan; 18(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 18435426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Acute Stroke Trials: Advantages of Multiple Imputation Using Baseline and Postbaseline Variables.
Young-Saver DF; Gornbein J; Starkman S; Saver JL
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3662-3669. PubMed ID: 30297167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of predictive performance in incomplete data by combining internal validation and multiple imputation.
Wahl S; Boulesteix AL; Zierer A; Thorand B; van de Wiel MA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):144. PubMed ID: 27782817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of methods for handling missing data on immunohistochemical markers in survival analysis of breast cancer.
Ali AM; Dawson SJ; Blows FM; Provenzano E; Ellis IO; Baglietto L; Huntsman D; Caldas C; Pharoah PD
Br J Cancer; 2011 Feb; 104(4):693-9. PubMed ID: 21266980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness in clinical trials: using multiple imputation to deal with incomplete cost data.
Burton A; Billingham LJ; Bryan S
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17456514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance.
Barnett PG; Hui SS
Mt Sinai J Med; 2000; 67(5-6):365-74. PubMed ID: 11064486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
