936 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26497141)
1. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the Realized Genomic Relationship Matrix to Open-Pollinated White Spruce Family Testing for Disentangling Additive from Nonadditive Genetic Effects.
Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; El-Kassaby YA
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):743-53. PubMed ID: 26801647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic dissection of repeatability considering additive and nonadditive genetic effects for semen production traits in beef and dairy bulls.
Nagai R; Kinukawa M; Watanabe T; Ogino A; Kurogi K; Adachi K; Satoh M; Uemoto Y
J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35860946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in
Calleja-Rodriguez A; Chen Z; Suontama M; Pan J; Wu HX
Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():666820. PubMed ID: 34305966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits.
Piaskowski J; Hardner C; Cai L; Zhao Y; Iezzoni A; Peace C
BMC Genet; 2018 Apr; 19(1):23. PubMed ID: 29636022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.
Muñoz PR; Resende MF; Gezan SA; Resende MD; de Los Campos G; Kirst M; Huber D; Peter GF
Genetics; 2014 Dec; 198(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 25324160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a 20K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) whole genome genotyping array for apple (Malus × domestica Borkh).
Bianco L; Cestaro A; Sargent DJ; Banchi E; Derdak S; Di Guardo M; Salvi S; Jansen J; Viola R; Gut I; Laurens F; Chagné D; Velasco R; van de Weg E; Troggio M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110377. PubMed ID: 25303088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 26676611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.
Garcia-Baccino CA; Lourenco DAL; Miller S; Cantet RJC; Vitezica ZG
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31867623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel genomic approaches unravel genetic architecture of complex traits in apple.
Kumar S; Garrick DJ; Bink MC; Whitworth C; Chagné D; Volz RK
BMC Genomics; 2013 Jun; 14():393. PubMed ID: 23758946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
