130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26497324)
1. Cut-off Scores and Clinical Change Indices for the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Large Sample of Normal and Several Psychotherapeutic Populations.
Timman R; de Jong K; de Neve-Enthoven N
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 26497324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Portuguese version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Normative data, reliability, and clinical significance cut-offs scores.
Machado PP; Fassnacht DB
Psychol Psychother; 2015 Dec; 88(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 25484181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Responsiveness to Therapeutic Change with Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Comparison of the Symptom Questionnaire-48 (SQ-48) with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45).
Carlier IV; Kovács V; van Noorden MS; van der Feltz-Cornelis C; Mooij N; Schulte-van Maaren YW; van Hemert AM; Zitman FG; Giltay EJ
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 26450457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Hebrew and Arabic Versions of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45).
Gross R; Glasser S; Elisha D; Tishby O; Madar Jacobson D; Levitan G; Lambert MJ; Ponizovsky AM
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2015; 52(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25841108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The orthogonal-oblique bi-level model of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2): Polish adaptation based on factor analysis.
Simon W; Śliwka P; Sobański JA; Klasa K; Sala P; Żak W; Busath G; Lambert MJ
Psychiatr Pol; 2015; 49(5):1043-70. PubMed ID: 26688853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Brief Symptom Inventory and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 in the Assessment of the Outcome Quality of Mental Health Interventions.
Crameri A; Schuetz C; Andreae A; Koemeda M; Schulthess P; Tschuschke V; von Wyl A
Psychiatry J; 2016; 2016():7830785. PubMed ID: 27699166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].
Zanello A; Weber Rouget B; Gex-Fabry M; Maercker A; Guimon J
Encephale; 2006; 32(1 Pt 1):45-59. PubMed ID: 16633290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire-45 in a clinical sample.
Jabrayilov R; Emons WHM; de Jong K; Sijtsma K
Qual Life Res; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 28194617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the outcome questionnaire-45.2: the Norwegian version in an international context.
Amble I; Gude T; Stubdal S; Oktedalen T; Skjorten AM; Andersen BJ; Solbakken OA; Brorson HH; Arnevik E; Lambert MJ; Wampold BE
Psychother Res; 2014; 24(4):504-13. PubMed ID: 24188797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary validation of the Rating of Outcome Scale and equivalence of ultra-brief measures of well-being.
Seidel JA; Andrews WP; Owen J; Miller SD; Buccino DL
Psychol Assess; 2017 Jan; 29(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 27099979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spanish Adaptation and Validation of the Outcome Questionnaire OQ-30.2.
Errázuriz P; Opazo S; Behn A; Silva O; Gloger S
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():673. PubMed ID: 28559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do routine outcome monitoring measures tell the same story? Evaluating outcome trajectories and clinical outcomes for the outcome rating scale and outcome questionnaire - 45.
Redmayne KA; Reese RJ; Zetzer HA; Conoley CW; Owen J
Psychother Res; 2024 Feb; 34(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 36931233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Translation of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) into Japanese: A cultural adaptation.
Takara R; Beecher ME; Okiishi JC; Shimokawa K; Lambert MJ; Griner D
Psychother Res; 2017 Mar; 27(2):154-166. PubMed ID: 26360667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The outcome questionnaire 45.2. Italian validation of an instrument for the assessment of psychological treatments].
Chiappelli M; Lo Coco G; Gullo S; Bensi L; Prestano C
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2008; 17(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 18589632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical psychological diagnostic system (KPD-38): sensitivity to change and validity of a self-report instrument for outcome monitoring and quality assurance.
Moessner M; Gallas C; Haug S; Kordy H
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 20812367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability (GAS-ID).
Hermans H; Wieland J; Jelluma N; Van der Pas F; Evenhuis H
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Aug; 57(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 23046166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF.
Visser MS; Dieleman M; Klijn S; Timman R; Lundström M; Busschbach JJ; Reus NJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 95(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 27775237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring patient distress in primary care.
Seelert KR; Hill RD; Rigdon MA; Schwenzfeier E
Fam Med; 1999; 31(7):483-7. PubMed ID: 10425529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 in outpatient anxiety clinics: A comparison between anxiety patients with and without co-occurring depression.
Levy HC; Billingsley AL; Springer KS; Hannan S; Das A; Tolin DF
J Clin Psychol; 2018 Sep; 74(9):1570-1582. PubMed ID: 29543337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) for presenting statistically and clinically significant psychotherapy outcome].
Schauenburg H; Strack M
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1998 Jul; 48(7):257-64. PubMed ID: 9739190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
