These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26497448)

  • 21. Preventing pressure ulcers: an evaluation of four operating-table mattresses.
    Defloor T; De Schuijmer JD
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 13(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 10960997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The biomechanical efficacy of a hybrid support surface in protecting supine patients from sacral pressure ulcers.
    Katz T; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 20(8):3148-3156. PubMed ID: 37073432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
    Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pressure relief capabilities of the Sof.Care bed and the Clinitron bed.
    Maklebust J; Siggreen MY; Mondoux L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():32, 36-41, 44. PubMed ID: 3250579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-stage versus single-stage inflation and deflation cycle for alternating low pressure air mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients: a randomised-controlled clinical trial.
    Demarré L; Beeckman D; Vanderwee K; Defloor T; Grypdonck M; Verhaeghe S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2012 Apr; 49(4):416-26. PubMed ID: 22056165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A prospective, observational study of high-specification foam immersion surfaces used in populations at high risk for pressure ulcers.
    Girolami S; Moore A; Haper C; Betts C; Woodward T
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Aug; 60(8):30-9. PubMed ID: 25105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pressure Mapping Comparison of Four OR Surfaces.
    Kirkland-Walsh H; Teleten O; Wilson M; Raingruber B
    AORN J; 2015 Jul; 102(1):61.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26119617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.
    Black J; Berke C; Urzendowski G
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 22552108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
    Ochs RF; Horn SD; van Rijswijk L; Pietsch C; Smout RJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Feb; 51(2):38-68. PubMed ID: 15699554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Air-fluidized therapy: physical properties and clinical uses.
    VanGilder C; Lachenbruch CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Sep; 65(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 20733376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Providing correct pressure-relieving devices for optimum outcome.
    Phillips L
    Br J Nurs; 1999 Nov 25-Dec 8; 8(21):1447-52. PubMed ID: 11011620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.
    Tissue Viability Society
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20097075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring Pressure Redistribution Properties of 4 Hospital Bed Surfaces: A Quality Improvement Project.
    Teleten O; Polyak TS; Espinoza J; Li AI; Rodgers AJ; Kirkland-Kyhn H
    Wound Manag Prev; 2022 Jun; 68(6):18-26. PubMed ID: 35895032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determining the optimal inner air cell pressure for the effective reduction of interface pressure.
    Sasaki N; Nakagami G; Sakai K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Nanjo Y; Sanada H
    J Tissue Viability; 2012 May; 21(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 22542135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interface pressure, wound healing, and satisfaction in the evaluation of a non-powered fluid mattress.
    Wells JA; Karr D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Feb; 44(2):38-42, 44-6, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 9526420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Phantom-Based Method to Assess X-Ray Table Mattress Interface Pressures.
    Alresheedi N; Walton LA; Tootell A; Webb JA; Hogg P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 51(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 32505598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and validity of a new model for assessing pressure redistribution properties of support surfaces.
    Matsuo J; Sugama J; Sanada H; Okuwa M; Nakatani T; Konya C; Sakamoto J
    J Tissue Viability; 2011 May; 20(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 21292487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forensic analysis of crib mattress properties on pediatric CPR quality--can we balance pressure reduction with CPR effectiveness?
    Niles DE; Maltese MR; Nishisaki A; Seacrist T; Leffelman J; Hutchins L; Schneck N; Sutton RM; Arbogast KB; Berg RA; Nadkarni VM
    Resuscitation; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23395793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.
    Counsell C; Seymour S; Guin P; Hudson A
    J Enterostomal Ther; 1990; 17(4):150-3. PubMed ID: 2380423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.