These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26497869)
1. Synchronizing thermodilution cardiac output measurements with spontaneous breathing does not improve precision. Kjetså E; Skjaervold NK; Skogvoll E; Kirkeby-Garstad I Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2016 Mar; 60(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 26497869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Precision of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Bolus Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements Varies With the Clinical Situation. Kirkeby-Garstad I; Trønnes H; Stenseth R; Sellevold OF; Aadahl P; Skogvoll E J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015 Aug; 29(4):881-8. PubMed ID: 25976600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method. Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]