These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2649816)

  • 1. Has osseointegration become implant osseohysteria?
    Meffert RM
    N Y State Dent J; 1989 Apr; 55(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 2649816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant.
    Nevins M; Nevins ML; Camelo M; Boyesen JL; Kim DM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 18546807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.
    Davies JE
    Anat Rec; 1996 Jun; 245(2):426-45. PubMed ID: 8769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Histochemical and ultrastructural studies on the consolidation of an endosseous dental implant in Macaca fascicularis].
    Mazzotti G; Ruggeri A; Ottani V; Maraldi NM
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 6589467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delay method of implantation enhances implant-bone binding: a comparison with the conventional method.
    Ogiso M; Tabata T; Lee RR; Borgese D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 7672842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and histologic features of a nonaxial load on the osseointegration of a posterior mandibular implant: report of a case.
    Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):273-5. PubMed ID: 9581414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mineralization at the interface of implants.
    Joos U; Wiesmann HP; Szuwart T; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):783-90. PubMed ID: 16697141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Léon [correction of Laurent] Guedj implant concept: simplification of the surgical phase in implantology].
    Fabie L; Guedj L; Pichaud Ch; Fabie M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2002 Nov; 103(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 12461462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Optic and electronic microscope study on the implant-tissue interface of titanium dental implants].
    Ruggeri A; Castellani PP; Franchi M; Ciusa R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1985; 34(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 3866925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone surfaces adjacent to a subperiosteal implant: a SEM study.
    Russell TE; Kapur SP
    J Oral Implantol; 1977; 7(3):415-39. PubMed ID: 275513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic evaluation of immediate versus delayed placement of implants after tooth extraction.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11458241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early tissue response to modified implant surfaces using back scattered imaging.
    Nakada H; Sakae T; LeGeros RZ; LeGeros JP; Suwa T; Numata Y; Kobayashi K
    Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 17846544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Todescan FF; Pustiglioni FE; Imbronito AV; Albrektsson T; Gioso M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12182289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone.
    Qahash M; Hardwick WR; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Wikesjö UM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 17622015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces.
    Elias JJ; Brunski JB; Scarton HA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 8990633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
    Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.