These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26498306)

  • 1. Re: Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Nair DB; Majoko F
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1713. PubMed ID: 26498306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Authors' reply re: Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Le Ray C; Blondel B; Prunet C; Khireddine I; Deneux-Tharaux C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1713-4. PubMed ID: 26498305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nulliparous caesarean section in the home of active management of labour.
    How K; Foley M; Stronge J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 7771991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Lee YY; Roberts CL; Patterson JA
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 24484103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Fielke RJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):84. PubMed ID: 24484102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Le Ray C; Blondel B; Prunet C; Khireddine I; Deneux-Tharaux C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):690-9. PubMed ID: 25412695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Robson classification: A tool for assessment of caesarean practices in France].
    Le Ray C; Prunet C; Deneux-Tharaux C; Goffinet F; Blondel B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Sep; 44(7):605-13. PubMed ID: 25861856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [C-Section: little but enough information to put a stop to the inadequacy].
    Campillo Artero C
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 25028299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rates of caesarean section and neonatal mortality.
    Taylor U; Zentay Z; Ganesh V; Apuzzio J; Murphy G; Iffy L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 32(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 1445126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cesarean section in the Burgundy perinatal network: reasons for differences in the management of mothers. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2003; 31: 606-613].
    Rudigoz RC
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Feb; 32(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 15123146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ["Inequalities in the management of women with previous caesarean delivery in France"].
    Deneux-Tharaux C; Proust A; Schmitz T
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):995-996. PubMed ID: 27720283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of ten years' experience of caesarean section at the maternity hospital Marika Iliadi, Athens.
    FOUCAS M; KARPOUSOGLOU J; GEORGIADES B
    Gynaecologia; 1955 Jul; 140(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 13251631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Emergency caesarean sections in primary care maternity: Impact of a color code].
    Linck C; Choserot M; Cristinelli S; Callec R; Morel O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Sep; 45(7):701-7. PubMed ID: 26775201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Delivery after cesarean section based on the data of the Obstetrical-Gynecological Clinic of the Higher Medical Institute in Plovdiv for the period of 1984-1988].
    Milchev N; Pekhlivanov B; Piperkov T; Masarliev A; Amaliev I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(3):8-11. PubMed ID: 2252157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the Robson classification has improved understanding of caesarean section rates in France.
    Vogel JP; Betrán AP; Gülmezoglu AM
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):700. PubMed ID: 25559493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternity hospitals ranking on prophylactic caesarean section rates: uncertainty associated with ranks.
    Rabilloud M; Ecochard R; Estève J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Jan; 94(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 11134839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Is the high frequency of Caesarean sections in a highly specialized gyneco-obstetric hospital justifiable?].
    Guzmán Ibarra Mde L; Ablanedo Aguirre J; Basavilvazo Rodríguez MA; Martínez Rodríguez OA; Ahumada Ramírez E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jun; 71():291-6. PubMed ID: 14515659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals.
    Glantz JC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Apr; 24(4):636-42. PubMed ID: 20836744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pregnancy and delivery in 2 Roman hospitals].
    Ballacci F; Farchi S; Pinnelli A
    Epidemiol Prev; 1996; 20(2-3):107-9. PubMed ID: 8766290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation.
    Davis G; Fleming T; Ford K; Mouawad MR; Ludlow J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Dec; 55(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 26223774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.