These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26498865)

  • 21. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Global visual processing in macaques studied using Kanizsa illusory shapes.
    Feltner KA; Kiorpes L
    Vis Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 27(3-4):131-8. PubMed ID: 20429964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: evidence from the PCN component.
    Töllner T; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1554-63. PubMed ID: 21903593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.
    Deiber MP; Rodriguez C; Jaques D; Missonnier P; Emch J; Millet P; Gold G; Giannakopoulos P; Ibañez V
    Neuroscience; 2010 Nov; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry in global and local information processing and interference in divided and selective attention using spatial frequency filters.
    Yoshida T; Yoshino A; Takahashi Y; Nomura S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 17476490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Keeping focused: sustained spatial selective visual attention is maintained in healthy old age.
    Quigley C; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1469():24-34. PubMed ID: 22765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gestalt perception and the decline of global precedence in older subjects.
    Staudinger MR; Fink GR; Mackay CE; Lux S
    Cortex; 2011; 47(7):854-62. PubMed ID: 20828678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigations of effects of temporal regularity on illusory-figure processing.
    Kasai T; Kitajo K; Makinae S
    Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 1766():147521. PubMed ID: 34015359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The contrasting impact of global and local object attributes on Kanizsa figure detection.
    Conci M; Müller HJ; Elliott MA
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1278-94. PubMed ID: 18078220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seeing without knowing: neural signatures of perceptual inference in the absence of report.
    Vandenbroucke AR; Fahrenfort JJ; Sligte IG; Lamme VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):955-69. PubMed ID: 24283494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information.
    Proverbio AM; Minniti A; Zani A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 9593970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gamma responses and ERPs in a visual classification task.
    Herrmann CS; Mecklinger A; Pfeifer E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Apr; 110(4):636-42. PubMed ID: 10378732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency.
    Tsvetanov KA; Mevorach C; Allen H; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1382-94. PubMed ID: 23812959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The representation of Kanizsa illusory contours in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.
    Sáry G; Köteles K; Kaposvári P; Lenti L; Csifcsák G; Frankó E; Benedek G; Tompa T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2137-46. PubMed ID: 19046395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.