638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26498938)
1. Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
Matsuda H; Parwani AS; Attanasio P; Huemer M; Wutzler A; Blaschke F; Haverkamp W; Boldt LH
Heart Vessels; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 26498938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact Force in Atrial Fibrillation: Role of Atrial Rhythm and Ventricular Contractions: Co-Force Atrial Fibrillation Study.
Sarkozy A; Shah D; Saenen J; Sieira J; Phlips T; Boris W; Namdar M; Vrints C
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 8(6):1342-50. PubMed ID: 26383774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of catheter/tissue contact during pulmonary vein isolation: the impact of atrial rhythm.
De Ponti R; Marazzi R; Doni LA; Marazzato J; Baratto C; Salerno-Uriarte JA
Europace; 2018 Feb; 20(2):288-294. PubMed ID: 28069836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mesh-type flexible tip catheter vs a contact force catheter for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A prospective nonrandomized 1:1 matched study.
Pak HN; Park JW; Yang SY; Yu HT; Uhm JS; Joung B; Lee MH; Kim TH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 32270578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and long-term effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: real-world experience from a prospective, multicentre observational cohort registry.
De Potter T; Van Herendael H; Balasubramaniam R; Wright M; Agarwal SC; Sanders P; Khaykin Y; Latcu DG; Maury P; Pani A; Hayes J; Kalman J; Nery P; Duncan E
Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f410-f418. PubMed ID: 29315382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy.
Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 25213917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With or Without Contact Force Sensing.
Hussein AA; Barakat AF; Saliba WI; Tarakji KG; Bassiouny M; Baranowski B; Tchou P; Bhargava M; Dresing T; Callahan T; Cantillon D; Kanj M; Lindsay BD; Wazni OM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 28(5):483-488. PubMed ID: 28185351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Makimoto H; Lin T; Rillig A; Metzner A; Wohlmuth P; Arya A; Antz M; Mathew S; Deiss S; Wissner E; Rausch P; Bardyszewski A; Kamioka M; Li X; Kuck KH; Ouyang F; Tilz RR
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24363353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Nakagawa H; Kautzner J; Natale A; Peichl P; Cihak R; Wichterle D; Ikeda A; Santangeli P; Di Biase L; Jackman WM
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 6(4):746-53. PubMed ID: 23873143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Stabile G; Solimene F; Calò L; Anselmino M; Castro A; Pratola C; Golia P; Bottoni N; Grandinetti G; De Simone A; Schillaci V; Bertaglia E; De Ponti R
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25378035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results.
Vassallo F; Cunha C; Serpa E; Meigre LL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Lovatto CV; Batista W; Serpa R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1877-1883. PubMed ID: 31397522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol.
Phlips T; Taghji P; El Haddad M; Wolf M; Knecht S; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R; Duytschaever M
Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f419-f427. PubMed ID: 29315411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters.
Winkle RA; Moskovitz R; Hardwin Mead R; Engel G; Kong MH; Fleming W; Salcedo J; Patrawala RA; Tranter JH; Shai I
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jun; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29460232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.
Knecht S; Reichlin T; Pavlovic N; Schaer B; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 25925494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact-force guided single-catheter approach for pulmonary vein isolation: Feasibility, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Pambrun T; Combes S; Sousa P; Bloa ML; El Bouazzaoui R; Grand-Larrieu D; Thompson N; Martin R; Combes N; Boveda S; Haïssaguerre M; Albenque JP
Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):331-338. PubMed ID: 27940124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Catheter-tissue contact force determines atrial electrogram characteristics before and lesion efficacy after antral pulmonary vein isolation in humans.
Kumar S; Chan M; Lee J; Wong MC; Yudi M; Morton JB; Spence SJ; Halloran K; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 24102727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contact-Force Catheters: Efficacy Versus Safety? Case Report of 2 Atrioesophageal Fistulae.
Gitenay E; O' Hara GE; Sarrazin JF; Nault I; Philippon F; Sadron Blaye-Felice M; Laaouaj J; Champagne J
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1483-1487. PubMed ID: 27545306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
