These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26498975)

  • 1. The double-edged sword of genetic accounts of criminality: causal attributions from genetic ascriptions affect legal decision making.
    Cheung BY; Heine SJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1723-38. PubMed ID: 26498975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disgust and biological descriptions bias logical reasoning during legal decision-making.
    Capestany BH; Harris LT
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 24571553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting sentencing for low-level crimes: comparing models of human judgment.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):375-95. PubMed ID: 20025422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA.
    Dar-Nimrod I; Heine SJ
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Sep; 137(5):800-18. PubMed ID: 21142350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paying for someone else's mistake: the effect of bystander negligence on perpetrator blame.
    Critcher CR; Pizarro DA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1357-70. PubMed ID: 18599657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial Trustworthiness Predicts Extreme Criminal-Sentencing Outcomes.
    Wilson JP; Rule NO
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1325-31. PubMed ID: 26162847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior.
    Appelbaum PS; Scurich N
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 24618524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments.
    Allen CH; Vold K; Felsen G; Blumenthal-Barby JS; Aharoni E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210584. PubMed ID: 30657761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.
    Laurent SM; Clark BA; Walker S; Wiseman KD
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 23725235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making.
    Kalis A; Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: a research review.
    Feigenson N; Park J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 16786404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility.
    Palamar M; Le DT; Friedman O
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 22591710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths?
    Aspinwall LG; Brown TR; Tabery J
    Science; 2012 Aug; 337(6096):846-9. PubMed ID: 22904010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation of affect control theory to the sentencing of criminals.
    Tsoudis O
    J Soc Psychol; 2000 Aug; 140(4):473-85. PubMed ID: 10981376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting premeditation: future behavior is seen as more intentional than past behavior.
    Burns ZC; Caruso EM; Bartels DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 May; 141(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 21823807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling perceptions of criminality and remorse from faces using a data-driven computational approach.
    Funk F; Walker M; Todorov A
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Nov; 31(7):1431-1443. PubMed ID: 27603691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry.
    Wiener RL; Bornstein BH; Voss A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):231-48. PubMed ID: 16786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic essentialist beliefs about criminality predict harshness of recommended punishment.
    Meyer M; Dolins FL; Grijalva Y; Gelman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):3230-3248. PubMed ID: 35758988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentencing, severity, and social norms: a rank-based model of contextual influence on judgments of crimes and punishments.
    Aldrovandi S; Wood AM; Brown GD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 24140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.