BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

625 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26499000)

  • 1. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
    Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
    Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Additional US or DBT after digital mammography: which one is the best combination?
    Elizalde A; Pina L; Etxano J; Slon P; Zalazar R; Caballeros M
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25523063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
    Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
    Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound.
    Huang JL; Lin Q
    Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    You C; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Xiao Q; Liu G; Shen X; Yang W; Peng W
    Breast Cancer; 2020 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31302894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast tomosynthesis for the clarification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions can decrease follow-up examinations and enables immediate cancer diagnosis.
    Bahrs SD; Otto V; Hattermann V; Klumpp B; Hahn M; Nikolaou K; Siegmann-Luz K
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 29451022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
    Raghu M; Durand MA; Andrejeva L; Goehler A; Michalski MH; Geisel JL; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Butler R; Forman HP; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27139264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.
    Lei J; Yang P; Zhang L; Wang Y; Yang K
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):595-602. PubMed ID: 24121712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BI-RADS 3 on dense breast screening ultrasound after digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Dibble EH; Singer TM; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():315-321. PubMed ID: 34482242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.