These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26499996)

  • 1. The measurement of intraocular pressure over positive soft contact lenses by rebound tonometry.
    Zeri F; De Cusatis M; Lupelli L; Swann PG
    J Optom; 2016; 9(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 26499996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the measurement of intraocular pressure with rebound tonometry.
    Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Donini B; Lupelli L; Zarrilli L; Swann PG
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Dec; 34(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 21636312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer with and without hydrogel contact lenses.
    Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Dutta D; Nicolsan MD; Nagaraj S; Kumar RS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 63(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 26044471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative measurement of intraocular pressure by Icare tonometry and Airpuff tonometry in healthy subjects and patients wearing therapeutic soft contact lenses.
    Anton A; Neuburger M; Böhringer D; Jordan JF
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 251(7):1791-5. PubMed ID: 23532453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses.
    Krolo I; Mihaljevic B; Kasumovic A; Bagatin F; Ravlic MM; Herman JS
    Acta Inform Med; 2020 Sep; 28(3):185-189. PubMed ID: 33417647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modern disposable hydrogel contact lens removal has a minimal effect on intraocular pressure.
    Hamilton-Maxwell K; King N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 25761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry over soft contact lenses.
    Gogniat F; Steinegger D; Nosch DS; Joos R; Goldschmidt M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 23292044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of lens material and intra-ocular pressure on the outcome of non-contact tonometry over soft contact lenses.
    Patel S; Stevenson G
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 19195922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applanation tonometry in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
    Allen RJ; Dev Borman A; Saleh GM
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Dec; 30(5):267-9. PubMed ID: 17382579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of the modulus of the lens material on intraocular pressure measurement through soft contact lenses.
    Boyraz S; Güngör I
    Ir J Med Sci; 2013 Sep; 182(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23207914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens.
    Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 25086831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device.
    Asrani S; Chatterjee A; Wallace DK; Santiago-Turla C; Stinnett S
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 20436362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with glaucoma.
    Gomes BA; Turiel P; Cavalcanti RS; Moraes HV; Santhiago MR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 24862386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry].
    Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions.
    Lee TE; Yoo C; Hwang JY; Lin S; Kim YY
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Sep; 40(9):923-9. PubMed ID: 25271991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular pressure measurement with the noncontact tonometer through soft contact lenses.
    Liu YC; Huang JY; Wang IJ; Hu FR; Hou YC
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Mar; 20(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 19593202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens.
    Lam AK; Tse JS
    J Optom; 2014; 7(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 24766866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of lens power and center thickness on the intraocular pressure measured through soft lenses: a comparison of two noncontact tonometers.
    Ogbuehi KC
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Jun; 35(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 22322110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tonopen XL assessment of intraocular pressure through silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Schornack M; Rice M; Hodge D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Sep; 38(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 22810946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.