These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26500128)

  • 1. Will the UK Supreme Court allow assisted dying?
    Griffith R
    Br J Nurs; 2015 Oct 22-Nov 11; 24(19):970-1. PubMed ID: 26500128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A discussion on the proposed assisted dying law.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2014 Aug; 19(8):408-10. PubMed ID: 25089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court judgment in Nicklinson: one step forward on assisted dying; two steps back on human rights: a commentary on the Supreme Court judgment in R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38.
    Wicks E
    Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(1):144-56. PubMed ID: 25398565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Assisted Dying Bill and the role of the physician.
    Mullock A
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):621-4. PubMed ID: 25575506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is It Now Institutionally Appropriate for the Courts to Consider Whether the Assisted Dying Ban is Human Rights Compatible? Conway v Secretary of State for Justice.
    Hobson C
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Aug; 26(3):514-530. PubMed ID: 29121333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should assisted dying be lawful?
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2014 Feb; 19(2):94, 96-8. PubMed ID: 24514111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Courts to look again at assisted dying law.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2017 May; 22(5):252-254. PubMed ID: 28467248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Escaping the shackles of law at the end of life: R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin).
    Herring J
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 23598284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulating Risk and Autonomy in Assisted Suicide: Conway V Secretary of State for Justice.
    Hobson C; Papadopoulou N
    Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):128-142. PubMed ID: 33914070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted dying - should the UK change its stance?
    Gordon D; Raphael CE; Vassiliou V
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Apr; 55(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 25628340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court says law on assisted dying may change in the future.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2014 Jun; 348():g4290. PubMed ID: 24972702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New developments in India concerning the policy of passive euthanasia.
    Kanniyakonil S
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Jun; 18(2):190-197. PubMed ID: 29446214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A matter of life or death. By upholding an assisted-suicide law, the Supreme Court helps reinforce the rights of doctors, patients and the statest.
    Taylor M
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Jan; 36(4):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 16480096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence.
    Martin SS
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Feb; 26(1):98-116. PubMed ID: 28981864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A democratic decision. No constitutional support for assisted suicide.
    Burns LP
    Mich Health Hosp; 1997; 33(5):24. PubMed ID: 10173293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A second Federal Court rejects ban on assisted suicide.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Apr; 11(7):6. PubMed ID: 11363293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary: The Limits of Conscientious and Religious Objection to Physician-Assisted Dying after the Supreme Court's Decision in Carter v. Canada.
    Attaran A
    Health Law Can; 2016 Feb; 36(3):86-98. PubMed ID: 27169203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Federal and Provincial Responsibilities to Implement Physician-Assisted Suicide.
    Baker D; Sharpe G; Lauks R
    Health Law Can; 2016 Feb; 36(3):148-58. PubMed ID: 27169208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Euthanasia: is there a case for changing the law?
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2007 Jun; 12(6):273-7. PubMed ID: 17577149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should patients be able to choose physician-assisted suicide at the end of their lives? For the proposal.
    Branthwaite MA
    Lancet Oncol; 2006 Jul; 7(7):602-3. PubMed ID: 16814212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.