These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26500191)

  • 1. The Alternative Omen Effect: Illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options.
    Marciano-Romm D; Romm A; Bourgeois-Gironde S; Deouell LY
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():324-38. PubMed ID: 26500191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative outcomes create biased expectations regarding the received outcome: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Marciano D; Bentin S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():126-139. PubMed ID: 29567108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The excess choice effect: The role of outcome valence and counterfactual thinking.
    Hafner RJ; White MP; Handley SJ
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 25660197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is and what could have been: an ERP study on counterfactual comparisons.
    Osinsky R; Walter H; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 24749988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Good Choice, Bad Judgment: How Choice Under Uncertainty Generates Overoptimism.
    Tong J; Feiler D; Ivantsova A
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):254-265. PubMed ID: 29283751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do framing effects reveal irrational choice?
    Mandel DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1185-98. PubMed ID: 23978186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discounting the freedom to choose: implications for the paradox of choice.
    Reed DD; Kaplan BA; Brewer AT
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):424-7. PubMed ID: 22503945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delay, doubt, and decision: how delaying a choice reduces the appeal of (descriptively) normative options.
    van de Ven N; Gilovich T; Zeelenberg M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 20424103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of free choice in memory for past decisions.
    Benney KS; Henkel LA
    Memory; 2006 Nov; 14(8):1001-11. PubMed ID: 17077034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Depressive states amplify both upward and downward counterfactual thinking.
    Feng X; Gu R; Liang F; Broster LS; Liu Y; Zhang D; Luo YJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 25937345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamics of choice in a changing world: Effects of full and partial feedback.
    Avrahami J; Kareev Y; Fiedler K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 27464492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining labelling effects within discrete choice experiments: an application to recreational site choice.
    Doherty E; Campbell D; Hynes S; van Rensburg TM
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Aug; 125():94-104. PubMed ID: 23648268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do the right thing: the assumption of optimality in lay decision theory and causal judgment.
    Johnson SG; Rips LJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Mar; 77():42-76. PubMed ID: 25773909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Considering Roads Taken and Not Taken: How Psychological Distance Influences the Framing of Choice Events.
    Valenti G; Libby LK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1239-1254. PubMed ID: 28903677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postdecision consolidation in a trend prediction task.
    Lundberg CG; Svenson O
    Scand J Psychol; 2000 Jun; 41(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 10870434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Structuralistic and meta-psychological approaches to ambivalence in schizophrenia].
    Sumida K; Tsuda H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(8):1037-44. PubMed ID: 14577287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Final Sampling Bias in Haptic Judgments: How Final Touch Affects Decision-Making.
    Mitsuda T; Yoshioka Y
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 28956682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A parametric relief signal in human ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.
    Fujiwara J; Tobler PN; Taira M; Iijima T; Tsutsui K
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):1163-70. PubMed ID: 18992349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
    Koehler DJ; James G
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.