These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26500259)

  • 21. Relatedness coefficients and their applications for triplets and quartets of genetic markers.
    Ritland K
    G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38411620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual identification from genetic marker data: developments and accuracy comparisons of methods.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 26230747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correcting for cryptic relatedness by a regression-based genomic control method.
    Yan T; Hou B; Yang Y
    BMC Genet; 2009 Dec; 10():78. PubMed ID: 19954543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-identifiability of identity coefficients at biallelic loci.
    Csűrös M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Mar; 92():22-9. PubMed ID: 24269334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new likelihood estimator and its comparison with moment estimators of individual genome-wide diversity.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Oct; 107(5):433-43. PubMed ID: 21522168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2002 Mar; 160(3):1203-15. PubMed ID: 11901134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On confidence intervals for genotype relative risks and attributable risks from case parent trio designs for candidate-gene studies.
    Franke D; Philippi A; Tores F; Hager J; Ziegler A; König IR
    Hum Hered; 2005; 60(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 16192736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.
    Csilléry K; Johnson T; Beraldi D; Clutton-Brock T; Coltman D; Hansson B; Spong G; Pemberton JM
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2091-101. PubMed ID: 16783017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 'True' null allele detection in microsatellite loci: a comparison of methods, assessment of difficulties and survey of possible improvements.
    Dąbrowski MJ; Bornelöv S; Kruczyk M; Baltzer N; Komorowski J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):477-88. PubMed ID: 25187238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
    Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assigning alleles to different loci in amplifications of duplicated loci.
    Huang K; Zhang P; Dunn DW; Wang T; Mi R; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1240-1253. PubMed ID: 31094065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding coefficients: an assessment of current methods.
    Wang J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):518-30. PubMed ID: 24444019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.