These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26500586)

  • 1. The hows and whys of face memory: level of construal influences the recognition of human faces.
    Wyer NA; Hollins TJ; Pahl S; Roper J
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1524. PubMed ID: 26500586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The hows and whys of face processing: Level of construal influences the holistic processing of human faces.
    Wyer NA; Hollins TJ; Pahl S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Dec; 144(6):1037-41. PubMed ID: 26436426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-Construal Priming Affects Holistic Face Processing and Race Categorization, but Not Face Recognition.
    Liu X; Liang X; Feng C; Zhou G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1973. PubMed ID: 31507505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.
    Freire A; Lee K; Symons LA
    Perception; 2000; 29(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10820599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):513-36. PubMed ID: 10881616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-Construal Priming Modulates Ensemble Perception of Multiple-Face Identities.
    Peng S; Zhang L; Xu R; Liu CH; Chen W; Hu P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1096. PubMed ID: 31156512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal distance and person memory: thinking about the future changes memory for the past.
    Wyer NA; Perfect TJ; Pahl S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jun; 36(6):805-16. PubMed ID: 20445022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects.
    Eng ZHD; Yick YY; Guo Y; Xu H; Reiner M; Cham TJ; Chen SHA
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():78-85. PubMed ID: 28687329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
    Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sideways look at configural encoding: two different effects of face rotation.
    Lewis MB; Glenister TE
    Perception; 2003; 32(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 12613782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding others: the face and person construal.
    Macrae CN; Quinn KA; Mason MF; Quadflieg S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Nov; 89(5):686-95. PubMed ID: 16351362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
    Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the head in configural body processing: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence from the inversion and scrambling effect.
    Soria Bauser D; Suchan B
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 109(3):564-582. PubMed ID: 29336028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.