These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26500592)

  • 1. Preference reversal in quantum decision theory.
    Yukalov VI; Sornette D
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1538. PubMed ID: 26500592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments.
    Chew SH; Li KK; Chark R; Zhong S
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2008; 20():179-201. PubMed ID: 19552309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who's biased? A meta-analysis of buyer-seller differences in the pricing of lotteries.
    Yechiam E; Ashby NJS; Pachur T
    Psychol Bull; 2017 May; 143(5):543-563. PubMed ID: 28263644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the rate of preference reversal in personal and social decision-making.
    Oliver A
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1250-7. PubMed ID: 24211758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?
    Cohen BJ
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8717589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of probability mode on preference reversal.
    González-Vallejo C; Wallsten TS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):855-64. PubMed ID: 1385620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threat affects risk preferences in movement decision making.
    O'Brien MK; Ahmed AA
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():150. PubMed ID: 26106311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantum Decision Theory in Simple Risky Choices.
    Favre M; Wittwer A; Heinimann HR; Yukalov VI; Sornette D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168045. PubMed ID: 27936217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ecologically rational choice and the structure of the environment.
    Pleskac TJ; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):2000-19. PubMed ID: 24979239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
    Tsetsos K; Usher M; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1275-93. PubMed ID: 21038979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing.
    Khrennikov A
    Biosystems; 2009 Mar; 95(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 19010383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for loss aversion disappearance and reversal in Walasek and Stewart (2015).
    André Q; de Langhe B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2659-2665. PubMed ID: 34166008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-making in state lotteries: half now or all of it later?
    Baker F; Johnson MW; Bickel WK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):965-70. PubMed ID: 15000546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles.
    Haffke P; Hübner R
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1597. PubMed ID: 25667576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum Propensity in Economics.
    Orrell D; Houshmand M
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():772294. PubMed ID: 35098110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pricing decisions from experience: the roles of information-acquisition and response modes.
    Golan H; Ert E
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():9-13. PubMed ID: 25490124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A psychophysical account of patient non-adherence to medical prescriptions. The case of insulin dose adjustment.
    Reach G
    Diabetes Metab; 2013 Feb; 39(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23103031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
    Bleichrodt H
    Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framing effects in choices between multioutcome life-expectancy lotteries.
    Bernstein LM; Chapman GB; Elstein AS
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(3):324-38. PubMed ID: 10424839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.