101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26501454)
21. Assessment of different quantification metrics of [
Akerele MI; Mushari NA; Forsythe RO; Syed M; Karakatsanis NA; Newby DE; Dweck MR; Tsoumpas C
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 29(1):251-261. PubMed ID: 32557152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recent developments in time-of-flight PET.
Vandenberghe S; Mikhaylova E; D'Hoe E; Mollet P; Karp JS
EJNMMI Phys; 2016 Dec; 3(1):3. PubMed ID: 26879863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Poisson noise obscures hypometabolic lesions in PET.
Kerr WT; Lau EP
Yale J Biol Med; 2012 Dec; 85(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 23239953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of TOF on Brain PET With Short-Lived
Wimalarathne DDN; Ruan W; Sun X; Liu F; Gai Y; Liu Q; Hu F; Lan X
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():823292. PubMed ID: 35308534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of different time framings, reconstruction algorithms and post-processing methods on the quantification of myocardial blood flow from
Akil S; Székely AE; Hedeer F; Olsson B; Engblom H; Hindorf C
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2024 Mar; 44(2):154-163. PubMed ID: 37881129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simulation of a Compton-based detector for low-dose high-resolution time-of-flight positron emission tomography.
Domurat-Sousa K; Poe CM; McDaniel MS; Spieglan E; Shida JF; Angelico E; Adams BW; Riviere PJ; Frisch HJ; Squires AH
ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 37214132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patlak Slope versus Standardized Uptake Value Image Quality in an Oncologic PET/CT Population: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Ince S; Laforest R; Itani M; Prasad V; Ashrafinia S; Smith AM; Wahl RL; Fraum TJ
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 38732298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with (82)Rb: Validation with (15)O-water using time-of-flight and point-spread-function modeling.
Germino M; Ropchan J; Mulnix T; Fontaine K; Nabulsi N; Ackah E; Feringa H; Sinusas AJ; Liu C; Carson RE
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):68. PubMed ID: 27650280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modulation of Point Spread Function for Super-Resolution Imaging.
Lu JY
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2024 Jan; 71(1):153-171. PubMed ID: 37988211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Poisson-noise weighted filter for time-of-flight positron emission tomography.
Zeng GL; Lv L; Huang Q
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art; 2020 Apr; 3(1):10. PubMed ID: 32350714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimal sampling rate for 3D single molecule localization.
Chang H; Fu S; Li Y
Opt Express; 2023 Nov; 31(24):39703-39716. PubMed ID: 38041286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spatial resolution and reconstructed size accuracy using advanced beamformers in linear array-based PAT systems.
Pi-Martín I; Cebrecos A; García-Garrigós JJ; Jiménez N; Camarena F
Photoacoustics; 2023 Dec; 34():100576. PubMed ID: 38174104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dimensioning Cuboid and Cylindrical Objects Using Only Noisy and Partially Observed Time-of-Flight Data.
Rodriguez B; Rangarajan P; Zhang X; Rajan D
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 37960374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning for Advancing PET Image Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions.
Hellwig D; Hellwig NC; Boehner S; Fuchs T; Fischer R; Schmidt D
Nuklearmedizin; 2023 Dec; 62(6):334-342. PubMed ID: 37995706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system.
Shirakawa Y; Matsutomo N
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Sep; 16(3):384-396. PubMed ID: 37368168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integrated Small Animal PET/CT/RT with Onboard PET/CT Image Guidance for Preclinical Radiation Oncology Research.
Cheng X; Yang D; Saha D; Sun X; Shao Y
Tomography; 2023 Mar; 9(2):567-578. PubMed ID: 36961005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of Reduced Image Noise on Deauville Scores in Patients with Lymphoma Scanned on a Long-Axial Field-of-View PET/CT-Scanner.
Korsholm K; Overbeck N; Dias AH; Loft A; Andersen FL; Fischer BM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images.
Itagaki K; Mitsumoto K; Kajisako M; Shioji M; Kawase S
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2023; 11(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 36619185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution between
Braune A; Oehme L; Freudenberg R; Hofheinz F; van den Hoff J; Kotzerke J; Hoberück S
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Sep; 9(1):58. PubMed ID: 36064989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
