333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26501701)
1. Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.
Mamidanna R; Ni Z; Anderson O; Spiegelhalter SD; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):727-32. PubMed ID: 26501701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008.
Coupland VH; Lagergren J; Lüchtenborg M; Jack RH; Allum W; Holmberg L; Hanna GB; Pearce N; Møller H
Gut; 2013 Jul; 62(7):961-6. PubMed ID: 23086798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.
Dikken JL; Dassen AE; Lemmens VE; Putter H; Krijnen P; van der Geest L; Bosscha K; Verheij M; van de Velde CJ; Wouters MW
Eur J Cancer; 2012 May; 48(7):1004-13. PubMed ID: 22456179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of hospital type on outcomes after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.
Dikken JL; Wouters MW; Lemmens VE; Putter H; van der Geest LG; Verheij M; Cats A; van Sandick JW; van de Velde CJ
Br J Surg; 2012 Jul; 99(7):954-63. PubMed ID: 22569956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Esophageal Cancer Surgeon Volume on Management and Mortality From Emergency Upper Gastrointestinal Conditions: Population-based Cohort Study.
Markar SR; Mackenzie H; Askari A; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):847-853. PubMed ID: 28704230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.
Dikken JL; van Sandick JW; Allum WH; Johansson J; Jensen LS; Putter H; Coupland VH; Wouters MW; Lemmens VE; van de Velde CJ; van der Geest LG; Larsson HJ; Cats A; Verheij M
Br J Surg; 2013 Jan; 100(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 23180474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England.
Almoudaris AM; Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Vincent C; Faiz O; Hanna GB
JAMA Surg; 2013 Mar; 148(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 23553312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgeon Volume and Surgeon Age in Relation to Proficiency Gain Curves for Prognosis Following Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.
Gottlieb-Vedi E; Mackenzie H; van Workum F; Rosman C; Lagergren P; Markar S; Lagergren J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):497-505. PubMed ID: 30324469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do the 2018 Leapfrog Group Minimal Hospital and Surgeon Volume Thresholds for Esophagectomy Favor Specific Patient Demographics?
Clark JM; Cooke DT; Hashimi H; Chin D; Utter GH; Brown LM; Nuño M
Ann Surg; 2021 Sep; 274(3):e220-e229. PubMed ID: 31425294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Surgeon Volume-outcome Relationship: Not Yet Ready for Policy.
Modrall JG; Minter RM; Minhajuddin A; Eslava-Schmalbach J; Joshi GP; Patel S; Rosero EB
Ann Surg; 2018 May; 267(5):863-867. PubMed ID: 28628561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on data from 145,523 Japanese patients collected from a nationwide web-based data entry system.
Iwatsuki M; Yamamoto H; Miyata H; Kakeji Y; Yoshida K; Konno H; Seto Y; Baba H
Gastric Cancer; 2019 Jan; 22(1):190-201. PubMed ID: 30302654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in volume, clinical practice and outcome after reorganisation of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: A longitudinal observational study.
Varagunam M; Hardwick R; Riley S; Chadwick G; Cromwell DA; Groene O
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 44(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 29433991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of surgeon and anesthesiologist volume on surgical outcomes.
Gani F; Kim Y; Weiss MJ; Makary MA; Wolfgang CL; Hirose K; Cameron JL; Wasey JO; Frank SM; Pawlik TM
J Surg Res; 2016 Feb; 200(2):427-34. PubMed ID: 26342836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Theory and Practice of Pancreatic Surgery in France.
Farges O; Bendersky N; Truant S; Delpero JR; Pruvot FR; Sauvanet A
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):797-804. PubMed ID: 28885506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Performing major upper abdominal operations in a low-volume hospital: is it possible?].
Kiil J; Henneberg EW
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Apr; 168(15):1529-33. PubMed ID: 16640973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30-day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the national cancer data base.
Swanson RS; Pezzi CM; Mallin K; Loomis AM; Winchester DP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 21(13):4059-67. PubMed ID: 25190121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.
Lazzarino AI; Nagpal K; Bottle A; Faiz O; Moorthy K; Aylin P
Ann Surg; 2010 Aug; 252(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 20622666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection.
Eppsteiner RW; Csikesz NG; McPhee JT; Tseng JF; Shah SA
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):635-40. PubMed ID: 19300225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk adjustment models for short-term outcomes after surgical resection for oesophagogastric cancer.
Fischer C; Lingsma H; Hardwick R; Cromwell DA; Steyerberg E; Groene O
Br J Surg; 2016 Jan; 103(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 26607783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
