380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26501733)
21. Hemianopic and quadrantanopic field loss, eye and head movements, and driving.
Wood JM; McGwin G; Elgin J; Vaphiades MS; Braswell RA; DeCarlo DK; Kline LB; Owsley C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Mar; 52(3):1220-5. PubMed ID: 21367969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Eye-head coordination and dynamic visual scanning as indicators of visuo-cognitive demands in driving simulator.
Mikula L; Mejía-Romero S; Chaumillon R; Patoine A; Lugo E; Bernardin D; Faubert J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0240201. PubMed ID: 33382720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human gaze stabilization during active head translations.
Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA; Gielen CC
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):295-304. PubMed ID: 11784751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The correlation between glaucomatous visual field loss and vision-related quality of life.
Orta AÖ; Öztürker ZK; Erkul SÖ; Bayraktar Ş; Yilmaz OF
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(5):e121-7. PubMed ID: 25642814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects on driving performance of visual field defects: a driving simulator study.
Lövsund P; Hedin A; Törnros J
Accid Anal Prev; 1991 Aug; 23(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 1883473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Glaucomatous visual fields and neurocognitive function are independently associated with poor lane maintenance during driving simulation.
Anderson DE; Bader JP; Boes EA; Gagrani M; Smith LM; Ndulue JK; Kedar S; Gulati V; Ghate DA; Rizzo M
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):419. PubMed ID: 33081721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Obstacle avoidance, visual detection performance, and eye-scanning behavior of glaucoma patients in a driving simulator: a preliminary study.
Prado Vega R; van Leeuwen PM; Rendón Vélez E; Lemij HG; de Winter JC
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77294. PubMed ID: 24146975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Driving responses of older and younger drivers in a driving simulator.
Fildes B; Charlton J; Muir C; Koppel S
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():559-72. PubMed ID: 18184513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity, reliability, and repeatability of the useful field of view test in persons with normal vision and patients with glaucoma.
Bentley SA; LeBlanc RP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):6763-9. PubMed ID: 22956614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 'I didn't see that coming': simulated visual fields and driving hazard perception test performance.
Glen FC; Smith ND; Jones L; Crabb DP
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 27489171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Glaucoma and on-road driving performance.
Haymes SA; LeBlanc RP; Nicolela MT; Chiasson LA; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 49(7):3035-41. PubMed ID: 18326696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An assessment of driving fitness in patients with visual impairment to understand the elevated risk of motor vehicle accidents.
Kunimatsu-Sanuki S; Iwase A; Araie M; Aoki Y; Hara T; Nakazawa T; Yamaguchi T; Ono H; Sanuki T; Itoh M
BMJ Open; 2015 Feb; 5(2):e006379. PubMed ID: 25724982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of driving performance of young and old drivers (with and without visual impairment) measured during in-traffic conditions.
Wood JM; Mallon K
Optom Vis Sci; 2001 May; 78(5):343-9. PubMed ID: 11384012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing images of everyday scenes.
Smith ND; Crabb DP; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(5):471-92. PubMed ID: 23193606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicting practical fitness to drive in drivers with visual field defects caused by ocular pathology.
Coeckelbergh TR; Brouwer WH; Cornelissen FW; Kooijman AC
Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):748-60. PubMed ID: 15709335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gaze changes with binocular versus monocular viewing in age-related macular degeneration.
Kabanarou SA; Crossland MD; Bellmann C; Rees A; Culham LE; Rubin GS
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2251-8. PubMed ID: 16996593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Binocular superior visual field areas associated with driving self-regulation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Yamasaki T; Yuki K; Awano-Tanabe S; Ono T; Murata H; Tsubota K; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 105(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 32217543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination.
Kotecha A; O'Leary N; Melmoth D; Grant S; Crabb DP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 18806294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance.
Wood JM; Troutbeck R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 1454365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss.
Cheong AM; Geruschat DR; Congdon N
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 18174838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
