125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26501820)
1. A method for comparing intra-tumoural radioactivity uptake heterogeneity in preclinical positron emission tomography studies.
Grafström J; Ahlzén HS; Stone-Elander S
EJNMMI Phys; 2015 Dec; 2(1):19. PubMed ID: 26501820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
Dong X; Wu P; Sun X; Li W; Wan H; Yu J; Xing L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25708154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes with quantitative gated SPECT: influence of algorithm, pixel size and reconstruction parameters in small and normal-sized hearts.
Hambye AS; Vervaet A; Dobbeleir A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1606-13. PubMed ID: 15290114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on patch-based regularization and dictionary learning.
Zhang W; Gao J; Yang Y; Liang D; Liu X; Zheng H; Hu Z
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5014-5026. PubMed ID: 31494950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes.
Ford EC; Kinahan PE; Hanlon L; Alessio A; Rajendran J; Schwartz DL; Phillips M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4280-8. PubMed ID: 17153406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDG-PET-based differential uptake volume histograms: a possible approach towards definition of biological target volumes.
Devic S; Mohammed H; Tomic N; Aldelaijan S; De Blois F; Seuntjens J; Lehnert S; Faria S
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150388. PubMed ID: 27007269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An algorithm for PET tumor volume and activity quantification: without specifying camera's point spread function (PSF).
Bhatt R; Adjouadi M; Goryawala M; Gulec SA; McGoron AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4187-202. PubMed ID: 22830752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort.
Hatt M; Majdoub M; Vallières M; Tixier F; Le Rest CC; Groheux D; Hindié E; Martineau A; Pradier O; Hustinx R; Perdrisot R; Guillevin R; El Naqa I; Visvikis D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25500829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.
Belhassen S; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1309-24. PubMed ID: 20384268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NanoPET imaging of [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole uptake in experimental mouse tumours.
Wyss MT; Honer M; Schubiger PA; Ametamey SM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 16258762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Between Static and Parametric 18F-FDG PET Images in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tixier F; Vriens D; Cheze-Le Rest C; Hatt M; Disselhorst JA; Oyen WJ; de Geus-Oei LF; Visser EP; Visvikis D
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26966161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transconvolution and the virtual positron emission tomograph--a new method for cross calibration in quantitative PET∕CT imaging.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Hentschel M; Klaeser B; Krause T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062503. PubMed ID: 23718608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic liver detection and standardised uptake value evaluation in whole-body Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography scans.
Chauvie S; Bertone E; Bergesio F; Terulla A; Botto D; Cerello P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():47-52. PubMed ID: 29428075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of algorithm for quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 15O-water with PET.
Katoh C; Morita K; Shiga T; Kubo N; Nakada K; Tamaki N
J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15534062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of realistic PET simulations incorporating tumor patient's specificity using anthropomorphic models: creation of an oncology database.
Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Le Maitre A; Hatt M; Tixier F; Efthimiou N; Nikiforidis GC; Visvikis D; Kagadis GC
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112506. PubMed ID: 24320465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
