These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26501964)

  • 1. Estimating the Counterfactual Impact of Conservation Programs on Land Cover Outcomes: The Role of Matching and Panel Regression Techniques.
    Jones KW; Lewis DJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141380. PubMed ID: 26501964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico reduce forest fragmentation.
    Ramirez-Reyes C; Sims KRE; Potapov P; Radeloff VC
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Dec; 28(8):1982-1997. PubMed ID: 29791763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country.
    Roopsind A; Sohngen B; Brandt J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(49):24492-24499. PubMed ID: 31740591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia.
    Clements T; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 25492724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
    Costedoat S; Corbera E; Ezzine-de-Blas D; Honey-Rosés J; Baylis K; Castillo-Santiago MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119881. PubMed ID: 25807118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.
    Yang W; Liu W; Viña A; Luo J; He G; Ouyang Z; Zhang H; Liu J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():86-95. PubMed ID: 23685121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the impact of private land conservation with synthetic control design.
    Sharma R; Jones S; Robinson D; Gordon A
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14150. PubMed ID: 37461881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management.
    Alix-Garcia JM; Sims KRE; Orozco-Olvera VH; Costica LE; Fernández Medina JD; Romo Monroy S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(27):7016-7021. PubMed ID: 29903902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are government incentives effective for avoided deforestation in the tropical Andean forest?
    Cuenca P; Robalino J; Arriagada R; Echeverría C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203545. PubMed ID: 30212511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation.
    Zu Ermgassen SOSE; Devenish K; Simmons BA; Gordon A; Jones JPG; Maron M; Schulte To Bühne H; Sharma R; Sonter LJ; Strange N; Ward M; Bull JW
    Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Aug; 29(15):4397-4411. PubMed ID: 37300408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deforestation and Forest Fragmentation in South Ecuador since the 1970s - Losing a Hotspot of Biodiversity.
    Tapia-Armijos MF; Homeier J; Espinosa CI; Leuschner C; de la Cruz M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133701. PubMed ID: 26332681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact evaluation of a payments for ecosystem services program on vegetation quantity and quality restoration in Inner Mongolia.
    Zhou T; Shen W; Qiu X; Chang H; Yang H; Yang W
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114113. PubMed ID: 34815155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of China's National Forest Protection Program and nature reserves.
    Ren G; Young SS; Wang L; Wang W; Long Y; Wu R; Li J; Zhu J; Yu DW
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1368-77. PubMed ID: 26171762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing representation of remote sensing derived forest structure and land cover across a network of protected areas.
    Muise ER; Coops NC; Hermosilla T; Ban SS
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2603. PubMed ID: 35366029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scale dependency in effectiveness, isolation, and social-ecological spillover of protected areas.
    Ament JM; Cumming GS
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):846-55. PubMed ID: 26836760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thirty years of land-cover change in Bolivia.
    Killeen TJ; Calderon V; Soria L; Quezada B; Steininger MK; Harper G; Solórzano LA; Tucker CJ
    Ambio; 2007 Nov; 36(7):600-6. PubMed ID: 18074899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa.
    Beresford AE; Eshiamwata GW; Donald PF; Balmford A; Bertzky B; Brink AB; Fishpool LD; Mayaux P; Phalan B; Simonetti D; Buchanan GM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e65370. PubMed ID: 23734249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of deforestation and land cover database for Bhutan (1930-2014).
    Reddy CS; Satish KV; Jha CS; Diwakar PG; Murthy YV; Dadhwal VK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Dec; 188(12):658. PubMed ID: 27832432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
    Muñoz Brenes CL; Jones KW; Schlesinger P; Robalino J; Vierling L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205964. PubMed ID: 30335845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs.
    Jack BK; Jayachandran S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(12):5326-5333. PubMed ID: 30072433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.