These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26502103)

  • 1. Should Dynamic Cervical Plates be Used With Interbody Cages?
    Duart-Clemente JM; Álvarez-Galovich L; Tomé F; Piñera-Parrilla ÁR; Duart-Clemente J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(21):E1167. PubMed ID: 26502103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Monosegmental spinal fusion: ventral cervical plates-- dynamic or static joint stability?].
    Beck M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(4):409. PubMed ID: 19693732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior cervical interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cage filled with synthetic bone graft in acute cervical spine injury.
    Hattou L; Morandi X; Lefebvre J; Le Reste PJ; Riffaud L; Hénaux PL
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 103(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27720376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.
    Kani KK; Chew FS
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 29058045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with Zero-P spacer: prospective comparative study-clinical and radiological results at a minimum 2 years after surgery.
    Vanek P; Bradac O; Delacy P; Lacman J; Benes V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E792-7. PubMed ID: 23524869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of early postoperative plain radiography following BOP fusion in cervical spinal surgery.
    Millares-Martin P; Ross S; Kirollos R
    Br J Neurosurg; 1997 Aug; 11(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 9337935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion with porous tantalum implant. Results in a series with long-term follow-up.
    Papacci F; Rigante L; Fernandez E; Meglio M; Montano N
    J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():159-162. PubMed ID: 27452131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Middle-Aged Woman With Nick Pain.
    Adelman SL; Watson JM; Bhat RG; Davis JE
    Ann Emerg Med; 2019 Jul; 74(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 31248499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study.
    Pitzen TR; Chrobok J; Stulik J; Ruffing S; Drumm J; Sova L; Kucera R; Vyskocil T; Steudel WI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 19287352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of cages subsidence in cervical spine after discectomy].
    Baranowska A; Baranowski P
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2006; 71(6):453-7. PubMed ID: 17585489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
    Barsa P; Suchomel P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with a zero-p spacer: radiographic results with a minimum follow-up of one year in a prospective study].
    Vaněk P; Bradáč O; Saur K
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 22217411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The angular profile of a cage has no influence on segmental alignment after anterior cervical stand-alone interbody fusion].
    Barsa P; Elgawhary S; Hradil J; Sercl M; Suchomel P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 25137499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High rate of fusion in sheep cervical spines following anterior interbody surgery with absorbable and nonabsorbable implant devices.
    Slivka MA; Spenciner DB; Seim HB; Welch WC; Serhan HA; Turner AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2772-7. PubMed ID: 17108827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Bertollo N; Christou C; Tan C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2364-2372. PubMed ID: 27549990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of carbon fiber cages in anterior cervical interbody fusion: report of 100 cases.
    Salame K; Ouaknine GE; Razon N; Rochkind S
    Neurosurg Focus; 2002 Jan; 12(1):E1. PubMed ID: 16212322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of the synthetic interbody cage and Grafton for anterior cervical fusion.
    Park HW; Lee JK; Moon SJ; Seo SK; Lee JH; Kim SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):E591-5. PubMed ID: 19644317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical arthroplasty.
    Danish SF; Marcotte PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Sep; 7(3):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 17877278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
    Niu CC; Liao JC; Chen WJ; Chen LH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):310-6. PubMed ID: 20124907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence.
    van Jonbergen HP; Spruit M; Anderson PG; Pavlov PW
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):645-9; discussion 649. PubMed ID: 16291105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.