These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26502882)

  • 21. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness of e-Learning in a Medical School 2.0 Model: Comparison of Item Analysis for Student-Generated vs. Faculty-Generated Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Janzen BW; Sommerfeld C; Gooi ACC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():184-188. PubMed ID: 30741193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of medical students in radiology. Written testing using uncued multiple-choice questions.
    Fajardo LL; Chan KM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 8262753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
    Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of image quality, repeated study, and assessment method on anatomy learning.
    Fenesi B; Mackinnon C; Cheng L; Kim JA; Wainman BC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):249-261. PubMed ID: 27764531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Developing an audiovisual notebook as a self-learning tool in histology: perceptions of teachers and students.
    Campos-Sánchez A; López-Núñez JA; Scionti G; Garzón I; González-Andrades M; Alaminos M; Sola T
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 23893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Douthit NT; Norcini J; Mazuz K; Alkan M; Feuerstein MT; Clarfield AM; Dwolatzky T; Solomonov E; Waksman I; Biswas S
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():640204. PubMed ID: 34368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Creation and implementation of a national emergency medicine fourth-year student examination.
    Senecal EL; Heitz C; Beeson MS
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 45(6):924-34. PubMed ID: 23948604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tips for developing a valid and reliable bank of multiple choice questions (MCQs).
    Sadaf S; Khan S; Ali SK
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012; 25(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 23823639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
    Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
    Loudon C; Macias-Muñoz A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):565-575. PubMed ID: 30192185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Difficulty and discrimination indices of multiple-choice examination items in a college of pharmacy therapeutics and pathophysiology course sequence.
    Caballero J; Wolowich WR; Benavides S; Marino J
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2014 Feb; 22(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 23419201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
    Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.