232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26503882)
1. Role of Reverse Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling.
Xie M; Bar-Zeev E; Hashmi SM; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13222-9. PubMed ID: 26503882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review - Bacteria and their extracellular polymeric substances causing biofouling on seawater reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Ho G
J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():586-599. PubMed ID: 29975885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multispecies biofilms on reverse osmosis membrane dictate the function and characteristics of the bacterial communities rather than their structure.
Ran N; Sorek G; Stein N; Sharon-Gojman R; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Environ Res; 2023 Aug; 231(Pt 1):115999. PubMed ID: 37105294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does chlorination of seawater reverse osmosis membranes control biofouling?
Khan MT; Hong PY; Nada N; Croue JP
Water Res; 2015 Jul; 78():84-97. PubMed ID: 25917390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing membrane and spacer biofouling by Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive Anoxybacillus sp. in forward osmosis.
Bogler A; Rice D; Perreault F; Bar-Zeev E
Biofouling; 2019 Jan; 35(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 30786764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: positively contributing factors of Sphingomonas.
Gutman J; Herzberg M; Walker SL
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):13941-50. PubMed ID: 25354089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofouling Mitigation in Forward Osmosis Using Graphene Oxide Functionalized Thin-Film Composite Membranes.
Perreault F; Jaramillo H; Xie M; Ude M; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jun; 50(11):5840-8. PubMed ID: 27160324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to evaluate hydrogen peroxide as a biofouling control agent in membrane treatment systems.
Yang Y; Kitajima M; Pham TP; Yu L; Ling R; Gin KY; Reinhard M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 63(6):488-494. PubMed ID: 27682323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined effects of Pseudomonas quinolone signal-based quorum quenching and graphene oxide on the mitigation of biofouling and improvement of the application potential for the thin-film composite membrane.
Li Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; Pu J; Hou LA
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 760():143348. PubMed ID: 33162137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Yuan B; Wang Z; Li X; Ren Y
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Feb; 202():50-8. PubMed ID: 26700758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metagenomics analysis of the key functional genes related to biofouling aggravation of reverse osmosis membranes after chlorine disinfection.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Luo LW; Wang Q; Tong X; Bai Y; Ni XY; Wang HB; Chen GQ; Nozomu I; Chen Z; Hu HY
J Hazard Mater; 2021 May; 410():124602. PubMed ID: 33234394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances.
Al Ashhab A; Sweity A; Bayramoglu B; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):397-409. PubMed ID: 28468513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of organic micropollutants on biofouling in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation.
Kim Y; Kim LH; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jan; 401():123386. PubMed ID: 32653793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules.
Gu Y; Wang YN; Wei J; Tang CY
Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 23384517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
