230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26504034)
1. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.
Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I
Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dose Distribution Optimization in Combined Intracavitary and Interstitial Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer].
Ozaki D; Miyazawa M; Habano Y; Kawashima M; Hoshino Y; Sutou T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 29681602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers.
Jamema SV; Sharma S; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21030317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate.
Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiobiological treatment planning evaluation of inverse planning simulated annealing for cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Palmqvist T; Dos S Matias L; Marthinsen AB; Sundset M; Wanderås AD; Danielsen S; Toma-Dasu I
Anticancer Res; 2015 Feb; 35(2):935-9. PubMed ID: 25667477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of DVH parameters and loading patterns of standard loading, manual and inverse optimization for intracavitary brachytherapy on a subset of tandem/ovoid cases.
Jamema SV; Kirisits C; Mahantshetty U; Trnkova P; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2010 Dec; 97(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 20846734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame.
Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different treatment planning optimization methods for vaginal HDR brachytherapy with multichannel applicators: A reduction of the high doses to the vaginal mucosa is possible.
Carrara M; Cusumano D; Giandini T; Tenconi C; Mazzarella E; Grisotto S; Massari E; Mazzeo D; Cerrotta A; Pappalardi B; Fallai C; Pignoli E
Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():58-65. PubMed ID: 29254592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric evaluation of manually and inversely optimized treatment planning for high dose rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Palmqvist T; Dybdahl Wanderås A; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Sundset M; Langdal I; Danielsen S; Toma-Dasu I
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1012-8. PubMed ID: 24975370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy.
Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
