These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26504034)
1. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy. Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors]. Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer. Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy. Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning. Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dose Distribution Optimization in Combined Intracavitary and Interstitial Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer]. Ozaki D; Miyazawa M; Habano Y; Kawashima M; Hoshino Y; Sutou T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 29681602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy. Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers. Jamema SV; Sharma S; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21030317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate. Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiobiological treatment planning evaluation of inverse planning simulated annealing for cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Palmqvist T; Dos S Matias L; Marthinsen AB; Sundset M; Wanderås AD; Danielsen S; Toma-Dasu I Anticancer Res; 2015 Feb; 35(2):935-9. PubMed ID: 25667477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of DVH parameters and loading patterns of standard loading, manual and inverse optimization for intracavitary brachytherapy on a subset of tandem/ovoid cases. Jamema SV; Kirisits C; Mahantshetty U; Trnkova P; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Pötter R Radiother Oncol; 2010 Dec; 97(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 20846734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame. Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy. Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different treatment planning optimization methods for vaginal HDR brachytherapy with multichannel applicators: A reduction of the high doses to the vaginal mucosa is possible. Carrara M; Cusumano D; Giandini T; Tenconi C; Mazzarella E; Grisotto S; Massari E; Mazzeo D; Cerrotta A; Pappalardi B; Fallai C; Pignoli E Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():58-65. PubMed ID: 29254592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric evaluation of manually and inversely optimized treatment planning for high dose rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Palmqvist T; Dybdahl Wanderås A; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Sundset M; Langdal I; Danielsen S; Toma-Dasu I Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1012-8. PubMed ID: 24975370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy. Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent. Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]