These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26504227)

  • 1. Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].
    Rasmussen A; Zucca R; Johansson F; Jirenhed DA; Hesslow G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Nov; 112(45):14060-5. PubMed ID: 26504227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in complex spike activity during classical conditioning.
    Rasmussen A; Jirenhed DA; Wetmore DZ; Hesslow G
    Front Neural Circuits; 2014; 8():90. PubMed ID: 25140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An application of Wagner's Standard Operating Procedures or Sometimes Opponent Processes (SOP) model to experimental extinction.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):215-234. PubMed ID: 32730080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pavlovian conditioning under partial reinforcement: The effects of nonreinforced trials versus cumulative conditioned stimulus duration.
    Harris JA; Bouton ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):256-272. PubMed ID: 32162948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learned response sequences in cerebellar Purkinje cells.
    Jirenhed DA; Rasmussen A; Johansson F; Hesslow G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(23):6127-6132. PubMed ID: 28533379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain mechanisms of extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response.
    Robleto K; Poulos AM; Thompson RF
    Learn Mem; 2004; 11(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 15466302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.
    Kremer EF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1978 Jan; 4(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 621465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Summation of reinforcement rates when conditioned stimuli are presented in compound.
    Andrew BJ; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21787099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are Purkinje Cell Pauses Drivers of Classically Conditioned Blink Responses?
    Jirenhed DA; Hesslow G
    Cerebellum; 2016 Aug; 15(4):526-34. PubMed ID: 26400585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When the stimulus is predicted and what the stimulus predicts: Alternative accounts of habituation.
    Hall G; Rodríguez G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):327-340. PubMed ID: 32730085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cerebellar substrates for error correction in motor conditioning.
    Gluck MA; Allen MT; Myers CE; Thompson RF
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2001 Nov; 76(3):314-41. PubMed ID: 11726240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Purkinje cell activity during classical eyeblink conditioning in decerebrate guinea pigs.
    Kotani S; Kawahara S; Kirino Y
    Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1068(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 16364260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elaboration of a model of Pavlovian learning and performance: HeiDI.
    Honey RC; Dwyer DM; Iliescu AF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):170-184. PubMed ID: 32730077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar anterior lobe after rabbit eyeblink conditioning.
    Green JT; Steinmetz JE
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 15897252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning about things that never happened: A critique and refinement of the Rescorla-Wagner update rule when many outcomes are possible.
    Hollis G
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1415-1430. PubMed ID: 31152383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feedback control of learning by the cerebello-olivary pathway.
    Rasmussen A; Hesslow G
    Prog Brain Res; 2014; 210():103-19. PubMed ID: 24916291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a cerebellar cortical memory trace.
    Jirenhed DA; Bengtsson F; Hesslow G
    J Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 27(10):2493-502. PubMed ID: 17344387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Localization and characterization of an essential associative memory trace in the mammalian brain.
    Poulos AM; Thompson RF
    Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 1621():252-9. PubMed ID: 25449891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.
    Christian KM; Thompson RF
    Learn Mem; 2003; 10(6):427-55. PubMed ID: 14657256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the stimulus processing assumptions of the sometimes-opponent-process (SOP) model explain instances of contextual learning?
    Vogel EH; Ponce FP; Brandon SE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):205-214. PubMed ID: 32730079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.