152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26504528)
1. A rapid dehydration leaf assay reveals stomatal response differences in grapevine genotypes.
Hopper DW; Ghan R; Cramer GR
Hortic Res; 2014; 1():2. PubMed ID: 26504528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Drought tolerance of the grapevine, Vitis champinii cv. Ramsey, is associated with higher photosynthesis and greater transcriptomic responsiveness of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling.
Cochetel N; Ghan R; Toups HS; Degu A; Tillett RL; Schlauch KA; Cramer GR
BMC Plant Biol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32019503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcriptomic response is more sensitive to water deficit in shoots than roots of Vitis riparia (Michx.).
Khadka VS; Vaughn K; Xie J; Swaminathan P; Ma Q; Cramer GR; Fennell AY
BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 30760212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expression of ABA synthesis and metabolism genes under different irrigation strategies and atmospheric VPDs is associated with stomatal conductance in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv Cabernet Sauvignon).
Speirs J; Binney A; Collins M; Edwards E; Loveys B
J Exp Bot; 2013 Apr; 64(7):1907-16. PubMed ID: 23630325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolite profiling and network analysis reveal coordinated changes in grapevine water stress response.
Hochberg U; Degu A; Toubiana D; Gendler T; Nikoloski Z; Rachmilevitch S; Fait A
BMC Plant Biol; 2013 Nov; 13():184. PubMed ID: 24256338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in hydraulic traits of grapevine rootstocks are not conferred to a common Vitis vinifera scion.
Barrios-Masias FH; Knipfer T; Walker MA; McElrone AJ
Funct Plant Biol; 2019 Feb; 46(3):228-235. PubMed ID: 32172766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between stomatal behavior, xylem vulnerability to cavitation and leaf water relations in two cultivars of Vitis vinifera.
Tombesi S; Nardini A; Farinelli D; Palliotti A
Physiol Plant; 2014 Nov; 152(3):453-64. PubMed ID: 24597791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cessation of berry growth coincides with leaf complete stomatal closure at pre-veraison for grapevine (Vitis vinifera) subjected to progressive drought stress.
Knipfer T; Wilson N; Jorgensen-Bambach NE; McElrone AJ; Bartlett MK; Castellarin SD
Ann Bot; 2023 Nov; 132(5):979-988. PubMed ID: 37742279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Hydraulics Between Two Grapevine Cultivars Reveals Differences in Stomatal Regulation Under Water Stress and Exogenous ABA Applications.
Dayer S; Scharwies JD; Ramesh SA; Sullivan W; Doerflinger FC; Pagay V; Tyerman SD
Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():705. PubMed ID: 32636852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gradients in stomatal conductance, xylem sap ABA and bulk leaf ABA along canes of Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz: molecular and physiological studies investigating their source.
Soar CJ; Speirs J; Maffei SM; Loveys BR
Funct Plant Biol; 2004 Jul; 31(6):659-669. PubMed ID: 32688937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stomatal closure is induced by hydraulic signals and maintained by ABA in drought-stressed grapevine.
Tombesi S; Nardini A; Frioni T; Soccolini M; Zadra C; Farinelli D; Poni S; Palliotti A
Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():12449. PubMed ID: 26207993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An abscisic acid-related reduced transpiration promotes gradual embolism repair when grapevines are rehydrated after drought.
Lovisolo C; Perrone I; Hartung W; Schubert A
New Phytol; 2008; 180(3):642-651. PubMed ID: 18700860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overexpressing VvWRKY18 from grapevine reduces the drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by increasing leaf stomatal density.
Zhang L; Zhang R; Ye X; Zheng X; Tan B; Wang W; Li Z; Li J; Cheng J; Feng J
J Plant Physiol; 2022 Aug; 275():153741. PubMed ID: 35690029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissecting the rootstock control of scion transpiration using model-assisted analyses in grapevine.
Peccoux A; Loveys B; Zhu J; Gambetta GA; Delrot S; Vivin P; Schultz HR; Ollat N; Dai Z
Tree Physiol; 2018 Jul; 38(7):1026-1040. PubMed ID: 29228360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grapevine species from varied native habitats exhibit differences in embolism formation/repair associated with leaf gas exchange and root pressure.
Knipfer T; Eustis A; Brodersen C; Walker AM; McElrone AJ
Plant Cell Environ; 2015 Aug; 38(8):1503-13. PubMed ID: 25495925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid.
Rogiers SY; Greer DH; Hatfield JM; Hutton RJ; Clarke SJ; Hutchinson PA; Somers A
Tree Physiol; 2012 Mar; 32(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 22199014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abscisic acid mediates a divergence in the drought response of two conifers.
Brodribb TJ; McAdam SA
Plant Physiol; 2013 Jul; 162(3):1370-7. PubMed ID: 23709665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcriptome profiling of Arabidopsis
Wang Z; Ouyang Y; Ren H; Wang S; Xu D; Xin Y; Hussain J; Qi G
Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():987606. PubMed ID: 36204078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. VvNAC17, a novel stress-responsive grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) NAC transcription factor, increases sensitivity to abscisic acid and enhances salinity, freezing, and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.
Ju YL; Yue XF; Min Z; Wang XH; Fang YL; Zhang JX
Plant Physiol Biochem; 2020 Jan; 146():98-111. PubMed ID: 31734522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foliar abscisic acid content underlies genotypic variation in stomatal responsiveness after growth at high relative air humidity.
Giday H; Fanourakis D; Kjaer KH; Fomsgaard IS; Ottosen CO
Ann Bot; 2013 Dec; 112(9):1857-67. PubMed ID: 24163176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
