These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2650470)

  • 1. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol].
    Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.
    Rankin RN; Eng FW
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
    Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iohexol in urography. Survey and present state.
    Ekelund L
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():25-9. PubMed ID: 6206689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iohexol and metrizoate in urography in children. Comparison between a non-ionic and an ionic contrast medium.
    Bolz KD; Skalpe IO; Gutteberg TJ
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 6731022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study.
    Egeblad M; Nielsen NT; Fries J; Laulund S
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
    Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
    Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contrast media in cardiology. Report of a randomized, double-blind multicenter comparative study of the side effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen contrast media].
    Hellige G; Vogel B; Tebbe U; Kreuzer H
    Z Kardiol; 1992 May; 81(5):290-2. PubMed ID: 1621410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of intravenous drip infusion excretory urography using ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
    Onitsuka H; Araki A; Torii Y; Tsukuda M; Murakami J; Ino A; Hashiguchi N; Masuda K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 49(7):915-20. PubMed ID: 2798075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of lopamidol and diatrizoate in excretory urography: a double-blind clinical study.
    Cochran ST; Ballard JW; Katzberg RW; Barbaric ZL; Spataro R; Iwamoto K; Lee JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):523-7. PubMed ID: 3044040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography].
    Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric urography: comparison of metrizamide and methylglucamine diatrizoate.
    Robey G; Reilly BJ; Carusi PA; Nguyen KB
    Radiology; 1984 Jan; 150(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 6359266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
    Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media vs. iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S108-11. PubMed ID: 3882612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metrizamide in experimental urography. IV. Effects of bilateral ureteric stasis on urine iodine concentration after intravenous infection of an ionic and a non-ionic contrast medium.
    Golman K; Scient C; Almén T; Förste H
    Invest Radiol; 1976; 11(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 1262184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: II. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iopromide in comparison with ioxaglate.
    Taenzer V; Meiisel P; Hartwig P
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():153-5. PubMed ID: 6139071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.