These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2650470)
21. [Tolerability of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide in x-ray computed tomography. Comparison with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml]. Fredy D; Heitz F; Mathieu D; Vasile N Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):358-60. PubMed ID: 2688533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents. Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Iopromide dosage and urographic image quality: is there an optimal dose? Dominik R; Keysser R; Taenzer V Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():111-5. PubMed ID: 2568777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography. Stiris MG; Laerum F Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography. Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Iopentol (Imagopaque 300) compared with iohexol (Omnipaque 300) and diatrizoate (Urografin 292) in pediatric urography. A clinical trial assessing adverse events and diagnostic information. Lanning P; Brekke O Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 4():S120-2. PubMed ID: 9204352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol. Rawlinson J; Hyde I; Williams J Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol. Kennedy C; Rickards D; Lee S; Sharp MB; Dawson P Br J Radiol; 1988 Apr; 61(724):288-93. PubMed ID: 3285943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats. Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Iodixanol in paediatric excretory urography: efficiency and safety compared to iohexol. Dacher J; Sirinelli D; Boscq M; Hassan M; Garel C; Chateil JF; Amar C Pediatr Radiol; 1998 Feb; 28(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 9472058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Low dose low osmolar intravenous urography. Eyes BE; Goldman M; Nixon TE; Scally J; Brown A Clin Radiol; 1987 Jul; 38(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 3304790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost. Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol in urography. Meiss L; Bakker AJ; Falke TH; Van Waes PF Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():68-71. PubMed ID: 8619356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acute side effects of iopromide and diatrizoate in urography. Sahin H; Bircan MK; Akay AF; Kuru AF Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):734-5. PubMed ID: 9817053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]