These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2650470)

  • 41. [Simplified urographic technique using non-ionic contrast media].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Bortolotto P
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 2236695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Evaluation of clinical tolerability and diagnostic efficacy of ioversol 350 in UIV. A randomized double-blind study of ioversol 350 versus iohexol 350].
    Voegeli E; Woessmer B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):293-6. PubMed ID: 1296495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Immunologic basis for adverse reactions to radiographic contrast media.
    Stejskal V; Nilsson R; Grepe A
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Nov; 31(6):605-12. PubMed ID: 2278787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Maximizing opacification during excretory urography: effect of low-osmolarity contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Apr; 43(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 1373337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Water-soluble contrast media in radiography of small bowel obstruction. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Stordahl A; Laerum F; Gjølberg T; Enge I
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 2964845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of ioversol and iohexol in intravenous urography.
    Colthurst JR; Chan O; Creagh M; Gordon P; Guy R; Muncey F; Ayers AB
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Sep; 42(3):174-6. PubMed ID: 2208927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Sodium or methyl glucamine salts as contrast media for urography (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Clauss W; Simon I
    Rofo; 1980 Jul; 133(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 6451536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Examination by densitometer on visualization of non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) in excretory urography. 1. Visualization by bolus injection].
    Ikeuchi T; Hamashima T; Sakamoto M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Feb; 36(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 2343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A double-blind comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Renwick IG; Fowler RC
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Jun; 41(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 2200632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography.
    Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of omnipaque with hypaque in temporomandibular arthrography.
    Kaplan PA; Lieberman RP; Chu WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Dec; 153(6):1225-7. PubMed ID: 2816636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Changes in serum magnesium during excretory urography. A comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Sahler LG; Prentice LI; Morris TW; Segal AJ
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Aug; 27(8):628-31. PubMed ID: 1428741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Examination by densitometer on visualization of non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) in excretory urography. 2. Changes in visualization by DIP].
    Ikeuchi T; Hamashima T; Sakamoto M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Feb; 36(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 2343807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Experimental and clinical studies of non-ionic isoosmolality contrast medium (iohexol 140)--II. IADSA in clinical practice].
    Tajima N
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Apr; 46(4):541-52. PubMed ID: 3532027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Excretory urography with glucagon: a randomized trial.
    Thomsen HS; Hartelius H; Jensen R; Flindt-Nielsen N; Ohlhues L
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):335-8. PubMed ID: 6340153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Low dose urography. A clinical comparison of three low osmolar (ratio 3) contrast media.
    Björk L; Zachrisson BF
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(5):557-9. PubMed ID: 3799228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [A new contrast medium (author's transl)].
    Wehling H
    Radiologe; 1975 Sep; 15(9):373-6. PubMed ID: 1188093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative trial of two urographic contrast media - Conray 420 and Urografin 370.
    Eyes BE; Evans AF; Whitehouse GH
    Australas Radiol; 1981 Jul; 25(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 7305784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experiences with iohexol (Omnipaque) at urography.
    Fjelldal A; Nordshus T; Eriksson J
    Pediatr Radiol; 1987; 17(6):491-2. PubMed ID: 3684363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.