171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26505182)
1. [Assessment of Work Engagement in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale 9 (UWES-9)].
Sautier LP; Scherwath A; Weis J; Sarkar S; Bosbach M; Schendel M; Ladehoff N; Koch U; Mehnert A
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2015 Oct; 54(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 26505182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring engagement at work: validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Fong TC; Ng SM
Int J Behav Med; 2012 Sep; 19(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 21681564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway.
Nerstad CG; Richardsen AM; Martinussen M
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 20015117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measuring the positive dimensions among health care workers: a contribution to the Italian validation of the UWES--Utrecht Work Engagement Scale].
Pisanti R; Paplomatas A; Bertini M
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2008; 30(1 Suppl A):A111-9. PubMed ID: 18700486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Tran TTT; Watanabe K; Imamura K; Nguyen HT; Sasaki N; Kuribayashi K; Sakuraya A; Nguyen NT; Bui TM; Nguyen QT; Truong TQ; Nguyen GTH; Minas H; Tsustumi A; Shimazu A; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12157. PubMed ID: 32827229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.
Kulikowski K
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Mar; 30(2):161-175. PubMed ID: 28366949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Nepalese version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Panthee B; Shimazu A; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2014; 56(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 25214188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion-Related Validity.
Wefald AJ; Mills MJ; Smith MR; Downey RG
Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2012 Mar; 4(1):67-90. PubMed ID: 26286971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students in a Chinese sample.
Meng L; Jin Y
Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Feb; 49():129-134. PubMed ID: 27918903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Version in Sri Lanka.
Wickramasinghe ND; Dissanayake DS; Abeywardena GS
BMC Res Notes; 2018 May; 11(1):277. PubMed ID: 29728126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees.
Kulikowski K
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2019 Jun; 25(2):241-249. PubMed ID: 28849984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrashort Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A Psychometric Assessment.
Merino-Soto C; Lozano-Huamán M; Lima-Mendoza S; Calderón de la Cruz G; Juárez-García A; Toledano-Toledano F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35055713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensionality of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9).
de Bruin GP; Henn CM
Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):788-99. PubMed ID: 24245073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring work engagement in Thailand: development and validation testing of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Thai version (UWES-TH).
Tatha O; Shimazu A; Watanabe K; Kawakami N; Schaufeli WB
Ind Health; 2024 Jun; 62(3):182-194. PubMed ID: 38148025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and psychometric validation of a brief comprehensive health status assessment scale in older patients with hematological malignancies: The GAH Scale.
Bonanad S; De la Rubia J; Gironella M; Pérez Persona E; González B; Fernández Lago C; Arnan M; Zudaire M; Hernández Rivas JA; Soler A; Marrero C; Olivier C; Altés A; Valcárcel D; Hernández MT; Oiartzabal I; Fernández Ordoño R; Arnao M; Esquerra A; Sarrá J; González-Barca E; González J; Calvo X; Nomdedeu M; García Guiñón A; Ramírez Payer A; Casado A; López S; Durán M; Marcos M; Cruz-Jentoft AJ;
J Geriatr Oncol; 2015 Sep; 6(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 26139300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric Properties of Spanish Version Student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S-9) in High-school Students.
Serrano C; Andreu Y; Murgui S; Martínez P
Span J Psychol; 2019 May; 22():E21. PubMed ID: 31079593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A German version of the Three-Dimensional Work Fatigue Inventory (3D-WFI): Factor structure, internal consistency, and correlates.
Frone MR; Reis D; Ottenstein C
Stress Health; 2018 Dec; 34(5):674-680. PubMed ID: 29993178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive, relational and task crafting: Spanish adaptation and analysis of psychometric properties of the Job Crafting Questionnaire.
Letona-Ibañez O; Carrasco M; Martinez-Rodriguez S; Amillano A; Ortiz-Marques N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223539. PubMed ID: 31589634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Work Engagement in South Korea.
Ho Kim W; Park JG; Kwon B
Psychol Rep; 2017 Jun; 120(3):561-578. PubMed ID: 28558613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring engagement in nurses: the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Torabinia M; Mahmoudi S; Dolatshahi M; Abyaz MR
Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2017; 31():15. PubMed ID: 28955665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
