120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26505268)
1. Bone Marrow Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Quality of Bone Marrow Specimens Using Slow and Rapid Aspiration Techniques and Evaluating Pain Intensity.
Grønkjær M; Hasselgren CF; Østergaard AS; Johansen P; Korup J; Bøgsted M; Bilgrau AE; Jensen P
Acta Haematol; 2016; 135(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 26505268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the quality of bone marrow assessment: Impact of operator techniques and use of a specimen preparation checklist.
Odejide OO; Cronin AM; DeAngelo DJ; Bernazzoli ZA; Jacobson JO; Rodig SJ; LaCasce AS; Mazeika TJ; Earles KD; Abel GA
Cancer; 2013 Oct; 119(19):3472-8. PubMed ID: 23921812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Swords RT; Anguita J; Higgins RA; Yunes AC; Naski M; Padmanabhan S; Kelly KR; Mahalingam D; Philbeck T; Miller L; Puga TA; Giles FJ; Kinney MC; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):809-13. PubMed ID: 21606230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.
Berenson JR; Yellin O; Blumenstein B; Bojanower D; Croopnick J; Aboulafia D; Upadhyaya G; Spadaccini C
Diagn Pathol; 2011 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 21429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between 1-needle technique versus 2-needle technique for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedures.
Al-Ibraheemi A; Pham T; Chen L; Syklawer E; Quesada A; Wahed A; Nedelcu E; Nguyen AN
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):974-8. PubMed ID: 23808470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone marrow aspiration in resource poor environment: our experience in Kenya.
Busarla SV
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 25823365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microscopic examination of bone marrow aspirate in healthy adults - comparison of two techniques of slide preparation.
Lewandowski K; Kowalik MM; Pawlaczyk R; Rogowski J; Hellmann A
Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Jun; 34(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 22145778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a combined aspiration and core biopsy technique on quality of core bone marrow specimens.
Reeder JP; Hawkins EC; Cora MC; Marks SL; Grindem CB
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2013; 49(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23148134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single- Versus Multiple-Site Harvesting Techniques for Bone Marrow Concentrate: Evaluation of Aspirate Quality and Pain.
Oliver K; Awan T; Bayes M
Orthop J Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 5(8):2325967117724398. PubMed ID: 28890905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain during bone marrow aspiration: prevalence and prevention.
Vanhelleputte P; Nijs K; Delforge M; Evers G; Vanderschueren S
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2003 Sep; 26(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 12967736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safe and effective sedation and analgesia for bone marrow aspiration procedures in children with alfentanil, remifentanil and combinations with midazolam.
Antmen B; Saşmaz I; Birbiçer H; Ozbek H; Burgut R; Işik G; Kilinç Y
Paediatr Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15725319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control of bone marrow aspirates: additional steps toward a safer and more efficient procedure.
Loureiro G; Rizzatti EG; Sandes AF; de Lourdes Chauffaille M
Cancer; 2014 May; 120(9):1441-2. PubMed ID: 24481771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reply to quality control of bone marrow aspirates: additional steps toward a safer and more efficient procedure.
Odejide OO; Jacobson JO; Abel GA
Cancer; 2014 May; 120(9):1442. PubMed ID: 24481832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pain in infants who are younger than 2 months during suprapubic aspiration and transurethral bladder catheterization: a randomized, controlled study.
Kozer E; Rosenbloom E; Goldman D; Lavy G; Rosenfeld N; Goldman M
Pediatrics; 2006 Jul; 118(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 16818537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of sternal, iliac, and humeral bone marrow aspiration in Beagle dogs.
Defarges A; Abrams-Ogg A; Foster RA; Bienzle D
Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Jun; 42(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 23577956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of canine core bone marrow biopsies from multiple sites using different techniques and needles.
Abrams-Ogg AC; Defarges A; Foster RA; Bienzle D
Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 41(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 22486437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of the Use of a Mallet during Bone Marrow Biopsy Collection on Specimen Quality: A Quality Improvement Project.
Mauzo SH; Golardi N; Baxter AJ; Sultana S; Nguyen ND; Zhang R; Kott MM; Zvavanjanja RC; Chen L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2018 Jul; 48(4):517-521. PubMed ID: 30143496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transpedicular aspiration of osteoprogenitor cells from the vertebral body: progenitor cell concentrations affected by serial aspiration.
McLain RF; Boehm CA; Rufo-Smith C; Muschler GF
Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):995-1002. PubMed ID: 19837006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone marrow aspiration before bone marrow core biopsy using the same bone marrow biopsy needle: a good or bad practice?
Islam A
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 16751305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of buffered lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a randomized, controlled trial.
Ruegg TA; Curran CR; Lamb T
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Jan; 36(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 19136338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
