These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2650549)

  • 1. On the selection of systems for automated cytogenetic analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Martin AO
    Am J Med Genet; 1989 Jan; 32(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2650549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical performance of a system for semiautomated chromosome analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J; Philip J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1987 Sep; 41(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 3631082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated chromosome analysis using the Magiscan Image Analyser.
    Graham J; Taylor CJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Dec; 2(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7469198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests of performance of four semi-automatic metaphase-finding and karyotyping systems.
    Korthof G; Carothers AD
    Clin Genet; 1991 Dec; 40(6):441-51. PubMed ID: 1778006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated cytogenetic analysis: accomplishments, present status and practical future possibilities.
    Lundsteen C; Philip J
    Clin Genet; 1989 Nov; 36(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 2689009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image analysis in cytology: DNA-histogramming versus cervical smear prescreening.
    Bengtsson EW; Nordin B
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1993; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 8338254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operator-assisted semi-automatic karyotyping of banded metaphases.
    Wulf HC
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1977; 19(2-3):146-58. PubMed ID: 908202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis and cost justification of automated data processing in the clinical laboratory.
    Westlake GE
    Clin Lab Med; 1983 Mar; 3(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 6404587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiautomated chromosome analysis. A clinical test.
    Philip J; Lundsteen C
    Clin Genet; 1985 Feb; 27(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 3978848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated multiple-cell karyotyping: a clinical feasibility study.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Clin Genet; 1991 May; 39(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 1860250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-cost metaphase finder system.
    Furukawa A; Minamihisamatsu M; Hayata I
    Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 20065693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of array-based whole genome scanning technologies as a cytogenetic tool in haematological malignancies.
    Maciejewski JP; Tiu RV; O'Keefe C
    Br J Haematol; 2009 Sep; 146(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 19563474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].
    Cancrini G; Iori A
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15305711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of methods for the cytogenetic analysis of human solid tumors.
    Tanaka K; Testa JR
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1987 Dec; 79(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 3480380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An expert diagnostic system based on neural networks and image analysis techniques in the field of automated cytogenetics.
    Beksaç MS; Eskiizmirliler S; Cakar AN; Erkmen AM; Dağdeviren A; Lundsteen C
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Mar; 3(4):217-29. PubMed ID: 8705397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic fluorescence metaphase finder speeds translocation scoring in FISH painted chromosomes.
    Piper J; Poggensee M; Hill W; Jensen R; Ji L; Poole I; Stark M; Sudar D
    Cytometry; 1994 May; 16(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 8033737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Chromosome analysis using image processing. Recent aspects and perspectives].
    Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Grouche L; Perissel B
    Ann Genet; 1989; 32(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2683979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.