144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26505660)
1. Effect of chemotherapy and heat on biomechanical properties of absorbable sutures.
Lapointe S; Zhim F; Sidéris L; Drolet P; Célestin-Noël S; Dubé P
J Surg Res; 2016 Jan; 200(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 26505660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery.
Müller DA; Snedeker JG; Meyer DC
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 11(1):111. PubMed ID: 27729082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Species-dependent premature degradation of absorbable suture materials caused by infection--impact on the choice of thread in vascular surgery.
Larena-Avellaneda A; Debus ES; Diener H; Dietz UA; Franke S; Thiedel A
Vasa; 2004 Aug; 33(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15461069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of superoxide ions in the degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures.
Lee KH; Chu CC
J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jan; 49(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10559743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study.
Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate (Maxon) sutures: in vitro, in the subcutis, and in the achilles tendon of rabbits.
Kangas J; Paasimaa S; Mäkelä P; Leppilahti J; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 11153008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
Kulak Z; Deja A; Tuszewski M
Polim Med; 1991; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
Lünstedt B; Debus S
Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture.
Bezwada RS; Jamiolkowski DD; Lee IY; Agarwal V; Persivale J; Trenka-Benthin S; Erneta M; Suryadevara J; Yang A; Liu S
Biomaterials; 1995 Oct; 16(15):1141-8. PubMed ID: 8562789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures.
Debus ES; Geiger D; Sailer M; Ederer J; Thiede A
Eur Surg Res; 1997; 29(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9013106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a combined gamma irradiation and Parylene plasma treatment on the hydrolytic degradation of synthetic biodegradable sutures.
Zhang L; Chu CC; Loh IH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Nov; 27(11):1425-41. PubMed ID: 8263005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
