These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26506172)

  • 1. Physiological and Medical Aspects That Put Women Soldiers at Increased Risk for Overuse Injuries.
    Epstein Y; Fleischmann C; Yanovich R; Heled Y
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S107-10. PubMed ID: 26506172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.
    Epstein Y; Yanovich R; Moran DS; Heled Y
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Nov; 113(11):2673-90. PubMed ID: 23238928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of cross-training on fitness and injury in women.
    Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; Anderson MK; Bushman TT; Jones BH
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():33-41. PubMed ID: 26101904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associations of Physical Fitness and Body Composition Characteristics With Simulated Military Task Performance.
    Pihlainen K; Santtila M; Häkkinen K; Kyröläinen H
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 28549046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors for injury associated with low, moderate, and high mileage road marching in a U.S. Army infantry brigade.
    Schuh-Renner A; Grier TL; Canham-Chervak M; Hauschild VD; Roy TC; Fletcher J; Jones BH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S28-S33. PubMed ID: 28986087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Swiss Army physical fitness test battery predicts risk of overuse injuries among recruits.
    Wyss T; Von Vigier RO; Frey F; Mäder U
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2012 Oct; 52(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 22976738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of injury and physical performance adaptations during military training.
    Rosendal L; Langberg H; Skov-Jensen A; Kjaer M
    Clin J Sport Med; 2003 May; 13(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 12792210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Gender and Physical Performance on Injuries: An Army Study.
    Anderson MK; Grier T; Dada EO; Canham-Chervak M; Jones BH
    Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):e131-e138. PubMed ID: 28012810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extreme conditioning programs and injury risk in a US Army Brigade Combat Team.
    Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; McNulty V; Jones BH
    US Army Med Dep J; 2013; ():36-47. PubMed ID: 24146241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategies for optimizing military physical readiness and preventing musculoskeletal injuries in the 21st century.
    Nindl BC; Williams TJ; Deuster PA; Butler NL; Jones BH
    US Army Med Dep J; 2013; ():5-23. PubMed ID: 24146239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical Fitness Predictors of a Warrior Task Simulation Test.
    Huang HC; Nagai T; Lovalekar M; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Sep; 32(9):2562-2568. PubMed ID: 30137030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Physiological aspects of women in combat].
    Libster D; Heled Y; Shapiro Y; Epstein Y
    Harefuah; 1999 Dec; 137(11):521-5, 592. PubMed ID: 10959362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Musculoskeletal, biomechanical, and physiological gender differences in the US military.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Sell TC; Abt JP; Nagai T; Deluzio J; McGrail M; Lephart SM
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():22-32. PubMed ID: 26101903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiological Implications, Performance Assessment and Risk Mitigation Strategies of Women in Combat-Centric Occupations.
    Greeves JP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S94-100. PubMed ID: 26506206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
    Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations.
    Nindl BC; Jones BH; Van Arsdale SJ; Kelly K; Kraemer WJ
    Mil Med; 2016 Jan; 181(1 Suppl):50-62. PubMed ID: 26741902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex Differences in World-Record Performance: The Influence of Sport Discipline and Competition Duration.
    Sandbakk Ø; Solli GS; Holmberg HC
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2018 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 28488921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.
    Nindl BC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S101-6. PubMed ID: 26506171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Military Body Composition Standards and Physical Performance: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.
    Harty PS; Friedl KE; Nindl BC; Harry JR; Vellers HL; Tinsley GM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2022 Dec; 36(12):3551-3561. PubMed ID: 34593729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries for soldiers deployed to Afghanistan.
    Roy TC; Knapik JJ; Ritland BM; Murphy N; Sharp MA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23156094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.