These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2650727)
1. The bonding of glass-ionomer cements to dental amalgam. Aboush YE; Jenkins CB Br Dent J; 1989 Apr; 166(7):255-7. PubMed ID: 2650727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives. al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META. Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology. Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A bond strength study of luted castable ceramic restorations. McInnes-Ledoux PM; Ledoux WR; Weinberg R J Dent Res; 1989 May; 68(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 2654232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bond strength of adhesive composites to dental substrates. Berry EA; Powers JM J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 7874252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strength between amalgam and tooth hard tissues with application of fluoride, glass ionomer cement and adhesive resin cement in various combinations. Shimizu A; Ui T; Kawakami M Dent Mater J; 1986 Dec; 5(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 3333234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Adhesion of polycarboxylate-based dental cements to enamel: an in vivo study. Jemt T; Stålblad PA; Oilo G J Dent Res; 1986 Jun; 65(6):885-7. PubMed ID: 3519712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The bonding of an adhesive resin cement to single and combined adherends encountered in resin-bonded bridge work: an in vitro study. Aboush YE; Jenkins CB Br Dent J; 1991 Sep; 171(6):166-9. PubMed ID: 1832915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates. Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Goracci G Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 11203834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure. Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. Arcoria CJ; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL J Oral Rehabil; 1989 May; 16(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 2664111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonding of a light-curing glass-ionomer cement to dental amalgam. Aboush YE; Elderton RJ Dent Mater; 1991 Apr; 7(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 1936641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metal-reinforced glass ionomers: their flexural and bond strengths to tooth substrates. Tjan AH; Morgan DL J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Feb; 59(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 3278094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximum bond strength of dental luting cement to amalgam alloy. Mojon P; Hawbolt EB; MacEntee MI; Belser UC J Dent Res; 1989 Nov; 68(11):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2685070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of tooth age on microtensile bond strength of two fluoride-releasing bonding agents. Ozer F; Sengun A; Ozturk B; Say EC; Tagami J J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16430009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]