These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26508349)

  • 1. Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner's perspective.
    Newey S; Davidson P; Nazir S; Fairhurst G; Verdicchio F; Irvine RJ; van der Wal R
    Ambio; 2015 Nov; 44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):624-35. PubMed ID: 26508349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Applications of camera trap in wildlife population ecology].
    Li Q; Wu JG; Kou XJ; Feng LM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Apr; 24(4):947-55. PubMed ID: 23898650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Camera Trap Survey Designs Miss Detections: Impacts on Estimates of Occupancy and Community Metrics.
    Pease BS; Nielsen CK; Holzmueller EJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166689. PubMed ID: 27902733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Camera traps and activity signs to estimate wild boar density and derive abundance indices.
    Massei G; Coats J; Lambert MS; Pietravalle S; Gill R; Cowan D
    Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Apr; 74(4):853-860. PubMed ID: 29024317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. WiseEye: Next Generation Expandable and Programmable Camera Trap Platform for Wildlife Research.
    Nazir S; Newey S; Irvine RJ; Verdicchio F; Davidson P; Fairhurst G; Wal RV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169758. PubMed ID: 28076444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of remote-trip cameras for wildlife surveys and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation activities at a nature reserve in Sichuan province, China.
    Dajun W; Sheng L; McShea WJ; Fu LM
    Environ Manage; 2006 Dec; 38(6):942-51. PubMed ID: 17001506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Monitoring Methods and Live Trapping in Mammals.
    Miranda Paez A; Sundaram M; Willoughby JR
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Camera-traps are a cost-effective method for surveying terrestrial squamates: A comparison with artificial refuges and pitfall traps.
    Welbourne DJ; Claridge AW; Paull DJ; Ford F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226913. PubMed ID: 31945104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of three different methods for monitoring the use of green bridges by wildlife.
    Gužvica G; Bošnjak I; Bielen A; Babić D; Radanović-Gužvica B; Šver L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e106194. PubMed ID: 25170607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dealing with the clandestine nature of wildlife-trade market surveys.
    Barber-Meyer SM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):918-23. PubMed ID: 20408867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial and temporal interactions between livestock and wildlife in South Central Spain assessed by camera traps.
    Kukielka E; Barasona JA; Cowie CE; Drewe JA; Gortazar C; Cotarelo I; Vicente J
    Prev Vet Med; 2013 Nov; 112(3-4):213-21. PubMed ID: 24050782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-observer approach with camera traps can correct imperfect detection and improve the accuracy of density estimation of unmarked animal populations.
    Nakashima Y; Hongo S; Mizuno K; Yajima G; Dzefck ZCB
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2011. PubMed ID: 35132116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microscope and spectacle: on the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation.
    Verma A; van der Wal R; Fischer A
    Ambio; 2015 Nov; 44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):648-60. PubMed ID: 26508351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Camera traps can be heard and seen by animals.
    Meek PD; Ballard GA; Fleming PJ; Schaefer M; Williams W; Falzon G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110832. PubMed ID: 25354356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of use-related, environmental, and managerial factors on soil loss from recreational trails.
    Olive ND; Marion JL
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1483-93. PubMed ID: 19062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the effect of poaching activity on wildlife species?
    Moore JF; Uzabaho E; Musana A; Uwingeli P; Hines JE; Nichols JD
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02397. PubMed ID: 34212448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters.
    Cowx IG; Arlinghaus R; Cooke SJ
    J Fish Biol; 2010 Jun; 76(9):2194-215. PubMed ID: 20557659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Terrestriality in the Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus morio) and implications for their ecology and conservation.
    Loken B; Spehar S; Rayadin Y
    Am J Primatol; 2013 Nov; 75(11):1129-38. PubMed ID: 23784888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods.
    Wearn OR; Glover-Kapfer P
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Mar; 6(3):181748. PubMed ID: 31032031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: Investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset.
    O'Connor KM; Nathan LR; Liberati MR; Tingley MW; Vokoun JC; Rittenhouse TAG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175684. PubMed ID: 28422973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.