BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26508499)

  • 21. Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database.
    Pivk Kupirovič U; Hristov H; Hribar M; Lavriša Ž; Pravst I
    Foods; 2020 Mar; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32244547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simply adding the word "fruit" makes sugar healthier: The misleading effect of symbolic information on the perceived healthiness of food.
    Sütterlin B; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():252-61. PubMed ID: 26184340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health motivation and product design determine consumers' visual attention to nutrition information on food products.
    Visschers VH; Hess R; Siegrist M
    Public Health Nutr; 2010 Jul; 13(7):1099-106. PubMed ID: 20100390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What is the value given by consumers to nutritional label information? Results from a large investigation in Europe.
    Gregori D; Ballali S; Vögele C; Galasso F; Widhalm K; Berchialla P; Baldi I
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2015; 34(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 25734529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An (un)healthy poster: When environmental cues affect consumers' food choices at vending machines.
    Stöckli S; Stämpfli AE; Messner C; Brunner TA
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():368-374. PubMed ID: 26431685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of a Short-Term Nutrition Education Child Care Pilot Intervention on Preschool Children's Intention To Choose Healthy Snacks and Actual Snack Choices.
    Joseph LS; Gorin AA; Mobley SL; Mobley AR
    Child Obes; 2015 Oct; 11(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 26280736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do Consumers Think Front-of-Package "High in" Warnings are Harsh or Reduce their Control? A Test of Food Industry Concerns.
    Acton RB; Hammond D
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2018 Nov; 26(11):1687-1691. PubMed ID: 30281206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adding a reward increases the reinforcing value of fruit.
    De Cock N; Vervoort L; Kolsteren P; Huybregts L; Van Lippevelde W; Vangeel J; Notebaert M; Beullens K; Goossens L; Maes L; Deforche B; Braet C; Eggermont S; Van Camp J; Lachat C
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Feb; 117(4):611-620. PubMed ID: 28382893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of Some Ingredients and Energy Content on Front-of-Pack Cereal Bar Labeling as Drivers of Choice and Perception of Healthiness: A Case Study with Exercisers.
    Salazar NA; Fiszman S; Orrego CE; Tarrega A
    J Food Sci; 2019 Aug; 84(8):2269-2277. PubMed ID: 31339566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do Health Claims and Front-of-Pack Labels Lead to a Positivity Bias in Unhealthy Foods?
    Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Dixon H; Neal B; Ball K; Hughes C
    Nutrients; 2016 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 27918426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Persuasive packaging? The impact of packaging color and claims on young consumers' perceptions of product healthiness, sustainability and tastiness.
    Hallez L; Vansteenbeeck H; Boen F; Smits T
    Appetite; 2023 Mar; 182():106433. PubMed ID: 36567019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consumer understanding and use of food and nutrition labeling in Turkey.
    Besler HT; Buyuktuncer Z; Uyar MF
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2012; 44(6):584-91. PubMed ID: 22770836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increasing willingness to taste novel foods: effects of nutrition and taste information.
    McFarlane T; Pliner P
    Appetite; 1997 Jun; 28(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 9218096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consumer Acceptance of Population-Level Intervention Strategies for Healthy Food Choices: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Perceived Fairness.
    Bos C; Lans IV; Van Rijnsoever F; Van Trijp H
    Nutrients; 2015 Sep; 7(9):7842-62. PubMed ID: 26389949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An analysis of the effects of a campaign supporting use of a health symbol on food sales and shopping behaviour of consumers.
    Mørk T; Grunert KG; Fenger M; Juhl HJ; Tsalis G
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Mar; 17(1):239. PubMed ID: 28274208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task.
    Mergelsberg ELP; MacLeod C; Mullan B; Rudaizky D; Allom V; Houben K; Lipp OV
    Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():405-413. PubMed ID: 30517890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Campus-based snack food vending consumption.
    Caruso ML; Klein EG; Kaye G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 24746548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods.
    Westcombe A; Wardle J
    Appetite; 1997 Feb; 28(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 9134094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.