372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26509251)
21. Improved kinetic analysis of dynamic PET data with optimized HYPR-LR.
Floberg JM; Mistretta CA; Weichert JP; Hall LT; Holden JE; Christian BT
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3319-31. PubMed ID: 22755714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic FDG PET imaging based on shortened protocols: a virtual clinical study.
Reshtebar N; Hosseini SA; Zhuang M; Sheikhzadeh P
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):199-213. PubMed ID: 38078995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dual time-point [
Samimi R; Kamali-Asl A; Ahmadyar Y; van den Hoff J; Geramifar P; Rahmim A
Phys Med; 2024 May; 121():103336. PubMed ID: 38626637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dynamic PET image reconstruction integrating temporal regularization associated with respiratory motion correction for applications in oncology.
Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045012. PubMed ID: 29339575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characteristics of whole-body dynamic
Zhang L; Zhang J; Miao J; Zhu G; Su X; Wang H
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jan; 14(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 38223020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative PET image reconstruction employing nested expectation-maximization deconvolution for motion compensation.
Karakatsanis NA; Tsoumpas C; Zaidi H
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Sep; 60():11-21. PubMed ID: 27887989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of dynamic reconstruction for parametric Patlak imaging in dynamic whole body PET.
Chalampalakis Z; Stute S; Filipović M; Sureau F; Comtat C
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(18):. PubMed ID: 34433155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relative Patlak plot for dynamic PET parametric imaging without the need for early-time input function.
Zuo Y; Qi J; Wang G
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(16):165004. PubMed ID: 30020080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.
Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Karakatsanis NA; Panin VY; Zhou Y; McMillan A; Cho S; Zaidi H; Casey ME; Wahl RL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):501-518. PubMed ID: 30269154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pulmonary imaging using respiratory motion compensated simultaneous PET/MR.
Dutta J; Huang C; Li Q; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4227-40. PubMed ID: 26133621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MRI-guided attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR: assessment of the effect of bone attenuation.
Akbarzadeh A; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Alam NR; Zaidi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 27(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 23264064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of simplified uptake measures against dynamic Patlak K
Wijngaarden JE; Huisman MC; Jauw YWS; van Dongen GAMS; Greuter HNJM; Schuit RC; Cleveland M; Gootjes EC; Vugts DJ; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):1897-1905. PubMed ID: 36820891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER.
Zhang X; Xie Z; Berg E; Judenhofer MS; Liu W; Xu T; Ding Y; Lv Y; Dong Y; Deng Z; Tang S; Shi H; Hu P; Chen S; Bao J; Li H; Zhou J; Wang G; Cherry SR; Badawi RD; Qi J
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 31302637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.
Brambilla M; Matheoud R; Secco C; Sacchetti G; Comi S; Rudoni M; Carriero A; Inglese E
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3854-65. PubMed ID: 17985631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A fast nonlinear method for parametric imaging of myocardial perfusion by dynamic (13)N-ammonia PET.
Golish SR; Hove JD; Schelbert HR; Gambhir SS
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jun; 42(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 11390558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Theoretical Analysis of Penalized Maximum-Likelihood Patlak Parametric Image Reconstruction in Dynamic PET for Lesion Detection.
Yang L; Wang G; Qi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Apr; 35(4):947-56. PubMed ID: 26625407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new methodology to derive 3D kinetic parametric FDG PET images based on a mathematical approach integrating an error model of measurement.
Colard E; Delcourt S; Padovani L; Thureau S; Dumouchel A; Gouel P; Lequesne J; Ara BF; Vera P; Taïeb D; Gardin I; Barbolosi D; Hapdey S
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Nov; 8(1):99. PubMed ID: 30443801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multi-graphical analysis of dynamic PET.
Zhou Y; Ye W; Brasić JR; Wong DF
Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):2947-57. PubMed ID: 19931403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
