These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26509565)

  • 21. Evaluating MRI-compatible pacemakers: patient data now paves the way to widespread clinical application?
    Santini L; Forleo GB; Santini M;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 36(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 23240924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetic resonance imaging for patients with permanent pacemakers: initial clinical experience.
    Goldsher D; Amikam S; Boulos M; Suleiman M; Shreiber R; Eran A; Goldshmid Y; Mazbar R; Roguin A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Feb; 8(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16544729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with cardiac pacemakers--a safe mode of operation].
    Kaasalainen T; Pakarinen S; Hänninen H
    Duodecim; 2015; 131(8):737-43. PubMed ID: 26237889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MRI in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.
    Vieira MS; Lazoura O; Nicol E; Rubens M; Padley S
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):928-34. PubMed ID: 23759137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MR in patients with pacemakers and ICDs: Defining the issues.
    Shinbane JS; Colletti PM; Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17178675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determining the risks of clinically indicated nonthoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design of the MagnaSafe Registry.
    Russo RJ
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 23453091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Guidelines for the performance of MRI in patients with cochlear implants].
    Dubrulle F; Vincent C; Varoquaux A; Ernst O; Veillon F
    J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 92(10):872-7. PubMed ID: 22000608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines].
    Hausmann D; Kern C; Schröder MT; Sütterlin M; Schönberg SO; Neff KW; Dinter DJ
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22068844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High ventricular lead impedance of a DDD pacemaker after cranial magnetic resonance imaging.
    Baser K; Guray U; Durukan M; Demirkan B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Sep; 35(9):e251-3. PubMed ID: 21303387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Schild H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug; 46(3):561-2; author reply 562. PubMed ID: 16053976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Luechinger R; Zeijlemaker VA; Pedersen EM; Mortensen P; Falk E; Duru F; Candinas R; Boesiger P
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Feb; 26(4):376-83; discussion 325-7. PubMed ID: 15618060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 T.
    Naehle CP; Kreuz J; Strach K; Schwab JO; Pingel S; Luechinger R; Fimmers R; Schild H; Thomas D
    Am Heart J; 2011 Jun; 161(6):1096-105. PubMed ID: 21641356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can cardiac pacemakers and magnetic resonance imaging systems co-exist?
    Martin ET
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Feb; 26(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 15657068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
    Verma A; Ha AC; Dennie C; Essebag V; Exner DV; Khan N; Lane C; Leipsic J; Philippon F; Sampaio M; Schieda N; Seifer C; Berthiaume A; Campbell D; Chakraborty S
    Can J Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1131-41. PubMed ID: 25262858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clarification to the article 'Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without specific absorption rate restrictions'.
    Mollerus ME
    Europace; 2010 Dec; 12(12):1798. PubMed ID: 20710022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: increased safety for pacemaker patients?
    Strach K; Naehle CP; Mühlsteffen A; Hinz M; Bernstein A; Thomas D; Linhart M; Meyer C; Bitaraf S; Schild H; Sommer T
    Europace; 2010 Jul; 12(7):952-60. PubMed ID: 20356915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [the German Pacemaker Register].
    Markewitz A
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2010 Dec; 21(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 21063716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Pacemaker or ICD and MRI: is MRI safety the new standard?].
    Amara W
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2011 Nov; 60(5):279-81. PubMed ID: 21907320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Follow-up. Pacemakers and MRIs.
    Harv Heart Lett; 2006 Dec; 17(4):7. PubMed ID: 17297674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Not all pacemakers are created equal: MRI conditional pacemaker and lead technology.
    Ahmed FZ; Morris GM; Allen S; Khattar R; Mamas M; Zaidi A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1059-65. PubMed ID: 24016320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.