225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26509833)
1. Predictive factors for invasive cancer in surgical specimens following an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in microcalcification-only lesions.
Gümüş H; Mills P; Fish D; Gümüş M; Cox K; Devalia H; Jones S; Jones P; Sever AR
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical and mammographic follow-up of papillary lesions and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Irfan K; Brem RF
Breast J; 2002; 8(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 12100116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Causes of failure in removing calcium in microcalcification-only lesions using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Gümüş H; Gümüş M; Devalia H; Mills P; Fish D; Jones P; Uyar A; Sever A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 22477646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not necessary in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Kotani H; Yoshimura A; Adachi Y; Ishiguro J; Hisada T; Ichikawa M; Gondou N; Hattori M; Kondou N; Sawaki M; Fujita T; Iwata H
Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 24989112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors that impact the upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Gümüş H; Mills P; Gümüş M; Fish D; Jones S; Jones P; Devalia H; Sever A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 23019055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.
Bagnall MJ; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Denley H; Geraghty JG; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 11895299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Smolkin JH; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):251-60. PubMed ID: 9646821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification: analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiologic followup.
Cangiarella J; Waisman J; Symmans WF; Gross J; Cohen JM; Wu H; Axelrod D
Cancer; 2001 Jan; 91(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 11148574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy.
O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of spring-loaded and vacuum-assisted techniques for stereotactic breast biopsy of impalpable microcalcification lesions: experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou.
Huang PC; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Chen SC; Chao TC; Ueng SH; Hsueh S; Chang MH; Ng SH
Chang Gung Med J; 2011; 34(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 21392477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience.
Killebrew LK; Oneson RH
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 16848839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs.
Margolin FR; Kaufman L; Jacobs RP; Denny SR; Schrumpf JD
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):251-4. PubMed ID: 15333764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.
Dillon MF; McDermott EW; Quinn CM; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):559-63. PubMed ID: 16705731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ductal carcinoma in situ on stereotactic biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications: Expression of SPARC (Secreted Protein, Acidic and Rich in Cysteine) can predict postoperative invasion.
Szynglarewicz B; Kasprzak P; Donizy P; Biecek P; Halon A; Matkowski R
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 114(5):548-556. PubMed ID: 27439354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy.
Philpotts LE; Lee CH; Horvath LJ; Lange RC; Carter D; Tocino I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1047-50. PubMed ID: 11000162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
