159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26510978)
21. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism.
Kocher CP; Howard MR; Fienup DM
Behav Modif; 2015 Jul; 39(4):600-21. PubMed ID: 25896361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of operant discrimination training on the vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism.
Lepper TL; Petursdottir AI; Esch BE
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):656-61. PubMed ID: 24114228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.
Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Contrucci SA; Maglieri KA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):459-73. PubMed ID: 9316259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shifting preferences for choice-making opportunities through histories of differential reinforcer quality.
Drifke MA; Tiger JH; Gifford MR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Feb; 52(1):227-239. PubMed ID: 30302759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Observational learning and children with autism.
Taylor BA; DeQuinzio JA
Behav Modif; 2012 May; 36(3):341-60. PubMed ID: 22569578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
Smith AP; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using activity schedules to promote varied application use in children with autism.
Brodhead MT; Courtney WT; Thaxton JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 29359369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Individual differences in choice (in)flexibility but not impulsivity in the common marmoset: an automated, operant-behavior choice task.
Adriani W; Romani C; Manciocco A; Vitale A; Laviola G
Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():554-63. PubMed ID: 24016838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Self-control in children with autism: response allocation during delays to reinforcement.
Dixon MR; Cummings A
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 11800188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
Kyonka EG; Grace RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
Reed P; Yoshino T
Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of differential reinforcement of other behavior during dyadic instruction to reduce stereotyped behavior of autistic students.
Haring TG; Breen CG; Pitts-Conway V; Gaylord-Ross R
Am J Ment Defic; 1986 May; 90(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 3717225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Response allocation in a rapid-acquisition concurrent-chains procedure: effects of overall terminal-link duration.
Christensen DR; Grace RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 19429217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Response competition and stimulus preference in the treatment of automatically reinforced behavior: a comparison.
Groskreutz MP; Groskreutz NC; Higbee TS
J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 21541129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct assessment of preferences for social interactions in children with autism.
Call NA; Shillingsburg MA; Bowen CN; Reavis AR; Findley AJ
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013 Dec; 46(4):821-6. PubMed ID: 24114289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating a tablet application and differential reinforcement to increase eye contact in children with autism.
Jeffries T; Crosland K; Miltenberger R
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 26477444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.
Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficacy of and preference for reinforcement and response cost in token economies.
Jowett Hirst ES; Dozier CL; Payne SW
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):329-45. PubMed ID: 26916640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
Alessandri J; Cançado CR
Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
