224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26511276)
1. The role of complexity metrics in a multi-institutional dosimetry audit of VMAT.
McGarry CK; Agnew CE; Hussein M; Tsang Y; McWilliam A; Hounsell AR; Clark CH
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1057):20150445. PubMed ID: 26511276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.
Glenn MC; Hernandez V; Saez J; Followill DS; Howell RM; Pollard-Larkin JM; Zhou S; Kry SF
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205015. PubMed ID: 30230475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of small MU/segment and dose rate on delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Huang L; Zhuang T; Mastroianni A; Djemil T; Cui T; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 27167278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Online adaptation and verification of VMAT.
Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3877-91. PubMed ID: 26133589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of off-axis SABR plan verification results by using adapted dose reconstruction algorithms for the Octavius 4D system.
Jeevanandam P; Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1738-1747. PubMed ID: 29431850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Masi L; Doro R; Favuzza V; Cipressi S; Livi L
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071718. PubMed ID: 23822422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-institutional dosimetry audit of rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Clark CH; Hussein M; Tsang Y; Thomas R; Wilkinson D; Bass G; Snaith J; Gouldstone C; Bolton S; Nutbrown R; Venables K; Nisbet A
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Nov; 113(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25465734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of log file analysis within VMAT audits.
McGarry CK; Agnew CE; Hussein M; Tsang Y; Hounsell AR; Clark CH
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150489. PubMed ID: 27072390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing software upgrades, plan properties and patient geometry using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) complexity metrics.
McGarry CK; Chinneck CD; O'Toole MM; O'Sullivan JM; Prise KM; Hounsell AR
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2027-34. PubMed ID: 21626935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On-line quality assurance of rotational radiotherapy treatment delivery by means of a 2D ion chamber array and the Octavius phantom.
Van Esch A; Clermont C; Devillers M; Iori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3825-37. PubMed ID: 17985628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-institutional comparison of simulated treatment delivery errors in ssIMRT, manually planned VMAT and autoplan-VMAT plans for nasopharyngeal radiotherapy.
Pogson EM; Aruguman S; Hansen CR; Currie M; Oborn BM; Blake SJ; Juresic J; Ochoa C; Yakobi J; Haman A; Trtovac A; Carolan M; Holloway L; Thwaites DI
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():55-66. PubMed ID: 29173921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability.
McNiven AL; Sharpe MB; Purdie TG
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):505-15. PubMed ID: 20229859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the complexity of treatment plans from a national IMRT/VMAT audit - Towards a plan complexity score.
Santos T; Ventura T; Lopes MDC
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():75-84. PubMed ID: 31982790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of pulsed IMRT and VMAT for re-irradiation treatments: dosimetric and delivery feasibilities.
Lin MH; Price RA; Li J; Kang S; Li J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8179-96. PubMed ID: 24200917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beam complexity and monitor unit efficiency comparison in two different volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery systems using automated planning.
Li C; Tao C; Bai T; Li Z; Tong Y; Zhu J; Yin Y; Lu J
BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 33691654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modulation indices and plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):12-22. PubMed ID: 31038843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
