These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26512216)

  • 1. Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches.
    Kwon Y; Lemieux M; McTavish J; Wathen N
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Oct; 103(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 26512216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references.
    McKeown S; Mir ZM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 33485394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 25588387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Duplicate publication in the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
    Bailey BJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Mar; 126(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11956527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.
    Hair K; Bahor Z; Macleod M; Liao J; Sena ES
    BMC Biol; 2023 Sep; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 37674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact.
    Gasparyan AY; Ayvazyan L; Akazhanov NA; Kitas GD
    Croat Med J; 2014 Feb; 55(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 24577829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews.
    von Elm E; Poglia G; Walder B; Tramèr MR
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(8):974-80. PubMed ID: 14982913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Duplicate Publication of Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Jia Y; Huang D; Wen J; Qureshi R; Wang Y; Rosman L; Chen Q; Robinson KA; Gagnier JJ; Ehrhardt S; Celentano DD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2027104. PubMed ID: 33270124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and implementation of Metta, a metasearch engine for biomedical literature retrieval intended for systematic reviewers.
    Smalheiser NR; Lin C; Jia L; Jiang Y; Cohen AM; Yu C; Davis JM; Adams CE; McDonagh MS; Meng W
    Health Inf Sci Syst; 2014; 2():1. PubMed ID: 25825665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications.
    Malički M; Utrobičić A; Marušić A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Feb; 29(1):010201. PubMed ID: 30591809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does information from ClinicalTrials.gov increase transparency and reduce bias? Results from a five-report case series.
    Adam GP; Springs S; Trikalinos T; Williams JW; Eaton JL; Von Isenburg M; Gierisch JM; Wilson LM; Robinson KA; Viswanathan M; Middleton JC; Forman-Hoffman VL; Berliner E; Kaplan RM
    Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):59. PubMed ID: 29661214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.
    Borah R; Brown AW; Capers PL; Kaiser KA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e012545. PubMed ID: 28242767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research.
    Borissov N; Haas Q; Minder B; Kopp-Heim D; von Gernler M; Janka H; Teodoro D; Amini P
    Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 11(1):172. PubMed ID: 35978441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duplicate publication rate decline in Korean medical journals.
    Kim SY; Bae CW; Hahm CK; Cho HM
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Feb; 29(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 24550641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of systematic review authors in dentistry: challenges in methodology and reporting.
    Major MP; Warren S; Flores-Mir C
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 19339434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report.
    Shokraneh F; Adams CE
    Syst Rev; 2019 May; 8(1):129. PubMed ID: 31146776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews.
    Frandsen TF; Eriksen MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():85-91. PubMed ID: 37201687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.