These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26513395)

  • 1. Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.
    Anthony TR; Sleeth D; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 26513395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
    Borsh FB; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Andrews R; Ashley K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.
    Koehler KA; Anthony TR; Van Dyke M; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 21965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and computational fluid dynamics investigation of a personal, high flow inhalable sampler.
    Anthony TR; Landázuri AC; Van Dyke M; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jun; 54(4):427-42. PubMed ID: 20418278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of facial feature dimensions and velocity parameters on particle inhalability.
    Anthony TR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Aug; 54(6):710-25. PubMed ID: 20457783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An empirical model of human aspiration in low-velocity air using CFD investigations.
    Anthony TR; Anderson KR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(4):245-55. PubMed ID: 25438035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.
    L'Orange C; Anderson K; Sleeth D; Anthony TR; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Mar; 60(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26467335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low-velocity air: orientation effects on mouth-breathing simulations.
    Anthony TR; Anderson KR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jul; 57(6):740-57. PubMed ID: 23316076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of impactor inlet efficiency on the measurement of wood dust size distribution.
    Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D; Ray AE
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11258864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aspiration and sampling efficiencies of the TSP and louvered particulate matter inlets.
    Kenny L; Beaumont G; Gudmundsson A; Thorpe A; Koch W
    J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 15877170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of increased sampling pump flow rates in a disposable, inhalable aerosol sampler.
    Stewart J; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Anthony TR; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):207-213. PubMed ID: 27676440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the closed-face cassette at different orientations while measuring total particles.
    Cook DM; Sleeth DK; Thiese MS; Larson RR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 25337937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler.
    Aizenberg V; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K; Smith J; Baron PA
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 10885891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low velocity air: orientation effects on nose-breathing simulations.
    Anderson KR; Anthony TR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Jun; 58(5):625-45. PubMed ID: 24665111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Site comparison of selected aerosol samplers in the wood industry.
    Kauffer E; Wrobel R; Görner P; Rott C; Grzebyk M; Simon X; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 20044585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.