BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26514132)

  • 1. Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model.
    Wottawa CR; Genovese B; Nowroozi BN; Hart SD; Bisley JW; Grundfest WS; Dutson EP
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3198-209. PubMed ID: 26514132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-Modal Haptic Feedback for Grip Force Reduction in Robotic Surgery.
    Abiri A; Pensa J; Tao A; Ma J; Juo YY; Askari SJ; Bisley J; Rosen J; Dutson EP; Grundfest WS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):5016. PubMed ID: 30899082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial palpation in robotic surgery using haptic feedback.
    Abiri A; Juo YY; Tao A; Askari SJ; Pensa J; Bisley JW; Dutson EP; Grundfest WS
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1252-1259. PubMed ID: 30187198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Features of haptic and tactile feedback in TORS-a comparison of available surgical systems.
    Friedrich DT; Dürselen L; Mayer B; Hacker S; Schall F; Hahn J; Hoffmann TK; Schuler PJ; Greve J
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 28470408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of force reflection with tactile sensing for minimally invasive robotics-assisted tumor localization.
    Talasaz A; Patel RV
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 24808305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haptic feedback in the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK): A user study based on grasping, palpation, and incision tasks.
    Saracino A; Deguet A; Staderini F; Boushaki MN; Cianchi F; Menciassi A; Sinibaldi E
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Aug; 15(4):e1999. PubMed ID: 30970387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of tactile feedback in grip force during laparoscopic training tasks.
    Wottawa CR; Cohen JR; Fan RE; Bisley JW; Culjat MO; Grundfest WS; Dutson EP
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Apr; 27(4):1111-8. PubMed ID: 23233002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactile Feedback Induces Reduced Grasping Force in Robot-Assisted Surgery.
    King CH; Culjat MO; Franco ML; Lewis CE; Dutson EP; Grundfest WS; Bisley JW
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2009; 2(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 27788101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback?
    Meccariello G; Faedi F; AlGhamdi S; Montevecchi F; Firinu E; Zanotti C; Cavaliere D; Gunelli R; Taurchini M; Amadori A; Vicini C
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 26559538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stiffness Assessment and Lump Detection in Minimally Invasive Surgery Using In-House Developed Smart Laparoscopic Forceps.
    Othman W; Vandyck KE; Abril C; Barajas-Gamboa JS; Pantoja JP; Kroh M; Qasaimeh MA
    IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2022; 10():2500410. PubMed ID: 35774413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing retraction forces with tactile feedback during robotic total mesorectal excision in a porcine model.
    Juo YY; Pensa J; Sanaiha Y; Abiri A; Sun S; Tao A; Vogel SD; Kazanjian K; Dutson E; Grundfest W; Lin A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1083-1090. PubMed ID: 34837593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of realistic force feedback in a robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery system.
    Moradi Dalvand M; Shirinzadeh B; Nahavandi S; Smith J
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Jun; 23(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 24328984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery.
    Koehn JK; Kuchenbecker KJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Oct; 29(10):2970-83. PubMed ID: 25539693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wearable haptic interfaces for applications in gynecologic robotic surgery: a proof of concept in robotic myomectomy.
    Giannini A; Bianchi M; Doria D; Fani S; Caretto M; Bicchi A; Simoncini T
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Aug; 13(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 31062181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.
    Amirabdollahian F; Livatino S; Vahedi B; Gudipati R; Sheen P; Gawrie-Mohan S; Vasdev N
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 29196867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can you feel the force just right? Tactile force feedback for training of minimally invasive surgery-evaluation of vibration feedback for adequate force application.
    von Bechtolsheim F; Bielert F; Schmidt S; Buck N; Bodenstedt S; Speidel S; Lüneburg LM; Müller T; Fan Y; Bobbe T; Oppici L; Krzywinski J; Dobroschke J; Weitz J; Distler M; Oehme F
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jul; 38(7):3917-3928. PubMed ID: 38834723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A robotic microsurgical forceps for transoral laser microsurgery.
    Chauhan M; Deshpande N; Pacchierotti C; Meli L; Prattichizzo D; Caldwell DG; Mattos LS
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):321-333. PubMed ID: 30465304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of a new haptic device and experiments in minimally invasive surgical robot.
    Wang T; Pan B; Fu Y; Wang S; Ai Y
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):240-250. PubMed ID: 29072504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Force sensing of multiple-DOF cable-driven instruments for minimally invasive robotic surgery.
    He C; Wang S; Sang H; Li J; Zhang L
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 24030887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Encouraging and Detecting Preferential Incipient Slip for Use in Slip Prevention in Robot-Assisted Surgery.
    Waters I; Jones D; Alazmani A; Culmer P
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.