These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26514457)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Management Strategies for Detection CIN2+ of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) Pap Smear in Thailand.
    Tantitamit T; Termrungruanglert W; Oranratanaphan S; Niruthisard S; Tanbirojn P; Havanond P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):6857-62. PubMed ID: 26514457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic analysis of human papillomavirus triage, repeat cytology, and immediate colposcopy in management of women with minor cytological abnormalities in Sweden.
    Ostensson E; Fröberg M; Hjerpe A; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1316-25. PubMed ID: 20846064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
    Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Chanthasenanont A; Muangto T; Nanthakomon T; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4353-4356. PubMed ID: 27797243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
    Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colposcopy Requirement of Papanicolaou Smear after Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) by Follow-up Protocol in an Urban Gynaecology Clinic, a Retrospective Study in Thailand.
    Perksanusak T; Sananpanichkul P; Chirdchim W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4977-80. PubMed ID: 26163625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
    Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of two strategies to follow-up ASC-US and LSIL screening results in The Netherlands using repeat cytology with or without additional hrHPV testing: a retrospective cohort study.
    Siebers AG; Arbyn M; Melchers WJ; van Kemenade FJ; Vedder JE; van der Linden H; van Ballegooijen M; Bekkers RL; Bulten J
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1141-9. PubMed ID: 24935226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of variations in triage cytology interpretation on human papillomavirus-based cervical screening and implications for screening algorithms.
    Ronco G; Zappa M; Franceschi S; Tunesi S; Caprioglio A; Confortini M; Del Mistro A; Carozzi F; Segnan N; Zorzi M; Giorgi-Rossi P;
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():148-155. PubMed ID: 27755998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Results and cost evaluation of triage with high risk HPV test in cervical cancer screening. A pilot study in Piedmont (North-West Italy)].
    Magnani C; Gillio Tos A; De Marco L; Calvia M; Cipelletti A; Bestagini P; Pagano E; Segnan N; Ronco G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 22706358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
    Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
    Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Provider management of equivocal cervical cancer screening results among underserved women, 2009-2011: follow-up of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Watson M; Benard V; Lin L; Rockwell T; Royalty J
    Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 25794897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
    Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.
    Cox JT;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 12952506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
    Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.