228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26514457)
1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Management Strategies for Detection CIN2+ of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) Pap Smear in Thailand.
Tantitamit T; Termrungruanglert W; Oranratanaphan S; Niruthisard S; Tanbirojn P; Havanond P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):6857-62. PubMed ID: 26514457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic analysis of human papillomavirus triage, repeat cytology, and immediate colposcopy in management of women with minor cytological abnormalities in Sweden.
Ostensson E; Fröberg M; Hjerpe A; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1316-25. PubMed ID: 20846064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Chanthasenanont A; Muangto T; Nanthakomon T; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4353-4356. PubMed ID: 27797243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopy Requirement of Papanicolaou Smear after Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) by Follow-up Protocol in an Urban Gynaecology Clinic, a Retrospective Study in Thailand.
Perksanusak T; Sananpanichkul P; Chirdchim W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4977-80. PubMed ID: 26163625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of two strategies to follow-up ASC-US and LSIL screening results in The Netherlands using repeat cytology with or without additional hrHPV testing: a retrospective cohort study.
Siebers AG; Arbyn M; Melchers WJ; van Kemenade FJ; Vedder JE; van der Linden H; van Ballegooijen M; Bekkers RL; Bulten J
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1141-9. PubMed ID: 24935226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of variations in triage cytology interpretation on human papillomavirus-based cervical screening and implications for screening algorithms.
Ronco G; Zappa M; Franceschi S; Tunesi S; Caprioglio A; Confortini M; Del Mistro A; Carozzi F; Segnan N; Zorzi M; Giorgi-Rossi P;
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():148-155. PubMed ID: 27755998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Results and cost evaluation of triage with high risk HPV test in cervical cancer screening. A pilot study in Piedmont (North-West Italy)].
Magnani C; Gillio Tos A; De Marco L; Calvia M; Cipelletti A; Bestagini P; Pagano E; Segnan N; Ronco G
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 22706358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Provider management of equivocal cervical cancer screening results among underserved women, 2009-2011: follow-up of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Watson M; Benard V; Lin L; Rockwell T; Royalty J
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 25794897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Triage for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance with Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan.
Fujiwara H; Suzuki M; Morisawa H; Sayama M; Kimura K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 20(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30678384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.
Cox JT;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 12952506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
